you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

If they don't uphold the Bill of Rights they're in violation of the Constitution, which is still the law of the land. They can choose that path but it makes their governance illegitimate, with all that implies.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

the Constitution, which is still the law of the land.

'The Law' is merely a tool of the rich to formalize their control over the poor.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's certainly how they use it, no argument there.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Otherwise, SCOTUS would rule to uphold the 1st Amendment. This is the most open-and-shut case I have ever heard of regarding free speech. The fact that they even held public arguments on the case rather than ruling summarily 9-0 means they're looking for rationalizations to finally bury 'free speech' once and for all.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You may be right but I hope you're wrong.