Macron's shambolic interview, cowers to Putin's warning

submitted by RandomCollection from youtube.com

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

OK - thanks for the counter argument - but none of this explains how Russia would beat an adversary that has five times the military capacity. Other countries would have to help Russia, and for that to potentially happen, and those countries would have to forego their trade relationships with NATO countries. Not going to happen, over a relatively minor part of territory in Ukraine. Everyone expects Russia and NATO countries to play the long game, to string out the offensive timeline in Ukraine. Various military industrial complexes benefit from this, while China gets cheap food, and India gets cheap oil. Everyone, except the Ukrainians are getting a piece of the war machine pie. It makes no sense to escalate tensions. If Russia were to do that, they would be isolated and defeated, unless China and/or India stupidly helped Russia. The other problem is nuclear bomb and missile responses, which would be devastating for everyone involved, and incredibly stupid.

[–]sdl5 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Your own source guts your argument-

Did you not actually read and note the sources and dates?

Even then Ru was at parity, perhaps better on the ground.

And THAT data was a year ago, long before Ru spooling up mil production OR the mass blowing up of NATO ground equipment.

And of course there is this key point: Since your premise includes ALL of US mil involved it thus forces a nuclear strike war. Which even the rabid neocons are hesitant to trigger

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Your own source guts your argument-

Nothing wrong with my sources. Nor can you prove that there's anything wrong with them.

Did you not actually read and note the sources and dates?

Not an issue, obviously.

Even then Ru was at parity, perhaps better on the ground.

LOL - in which fucking universe?

And THAT data was a year ago, long before Ru spooling up mil production OR the mass blowing up of NATO ground equipment.

Also ridiculous. All countries have had similar production and replacement schedules. Russia's also lost quite a bit in the Ukraine war.

And of course there is this key point: Since your premise includes ALL of US mil involved it thus forces a nuclear strike war. Which even the rabid neocons are hesitant to trigger

Not an issue. Perhaps re-read my statement. And if you want to discuss nuclear war, everyone knows all sides would lose, but Russia would be especially at a loss. No one wants that.

[–]sdl5 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whew.

Incredible.

I hope you are getting paid to be writing such blatant bullshit and denial of reality- even as multiple US aligned nations and peeps corroborate exactly what we are all saying AND your own source details in the Notes you clearly never even glanced at.

But you do you, slay queen, yas girl you go! and whatever else you need to feel you won here 💁