all 6 comments

[–]tomatopotato★ Free Assange ★ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

As much as these injections and everything about them disgusts me, they shouldn't be banned any more than say HCQ, IVM, etc. Banning them would be a tacit endorsement of the power structure that tries to tells us what we can and can't take - and by extension, what we must take. Would be more effective if more politicians backed efforts like Paxton's, as well as shined more light inward on the CDC, NIH, HHS, the rest of Capitol Hill, and perhaps most importantly, the DOD.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The approval the injections got should be withdrawn completely based on what we now know about the questionable process that led to them being approved in the first place and the adverse events and other potential long-term consequences for people who got vaccinated.

Shining more light on those agencies is good but not sufficient, there needs to be serious accountability for their actions because of the tremendous harm they did to the American public - the approval of the vaccine based on so little evidence of its efficacy and safety; the extension of the target population to include low-risk groups, especially infants and children, even after the adverse risks were known; the mandates that destroyed small businesses, laid waste to people's financial security and divided families; the assault on readily available preventative and early treatment options like IVM and HCQ that could have saved lives, including many who died in the hospital because of the lucrative protocols in use there; the silencing of experts who were pointing out problems with the vaccine and the pandemic policies in general; and much, much more. There must be a reckoning for conduct causing such egregious harm if we're ever to get beyond this.

[–]tomatopotato★ Free Assange ★ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On second thought... I forgot about shedding, as well as potential blood donor issues. That would make banning considerably more reasonable.

[–]tomatopotato★ Free Assange ★ 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agree, approval should be withdrawn.

Agree again, full disclosure is only the first step.

[–]hfxB0oyA 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This days at least as much about people's faith in the legacy media as it does about their trust in the vaccines.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excerpt, much more at the link:

More than a month since US health officials recommended updated COVID-19 vaccines for all Americans, only 7.1 percent of US adults have rolled up their sleeves for the shot and just 2.1 percent of children have been immunized.

‘Nobody wants to speak about COVID’: Less than 3% of eligible Americans got a booster shot in September — does that mean trouble for these 3 big vaccine stocks? [hope so!]

44 candidates, 26 electeds, 18 states pledge BAN on “vaccination”—and that list is growing

Texas AG Ken Paxton SUING Pfizer. This new case has completely twisted corporate media around the axle. This sarcastic Daily Chaos, I mean Daily KOS, headline popped up all over the place [u/FThumb, you might appreciate this]:

Texas attorney general sues Pfizer, claiming vaccine didn't end pandemic quickly enough

Major “narrative shifts” emerge around Ukraine, gain-of-function research and UFO disclosure

New Yorkers pushing back—and winning some—against 5G: LinkNYC Operator Withdraws Westbeth 5G Tower Plans

VICTORY: UMass Boston quietly removes DEI requirements from faculty applications

Self checkouts will be scrapped at Walmart, Costco, and Wegmans

DELTA AIR LINES GATE AGENT PUSHES BACK AFTER BEING ACCUSED OF “MISGENDERING” TRANS PASSENGER