all 3 comments

[–]RandomCollection[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://archive.ph/euqMg

What I had not anticipated was that almost without exception everyone I heard or spoke to would be in unanimous and passionate agreement. I witnessed only one panel participant say anything at all favourable about the US as a model of democracy and values. In my conversations with the younger Qataris present, some already in positions of responsibility, and who belong to the generations that will lead the country in the future, they were as one: they didn’t want to hear another word about US leadership, moral authority or promotion of international norms and human rights – ever.

Yep - an this is going on in not just Qatar, but throughout the world.

Those of us who believe not only that we are moving into a multipolar world, but that it is a moral and equitable imperative that we should do so, may welcome a more modest American role in international affairs. But that is an outcome that should be reached through discussion, and through proper recognition that the post-Second World War geopolitical architecture needs drastic revisions to reflect the realities of today.

It should have been something that the US just accepted, as the rest of the world developed. Instead the US tried to cling to power with military force.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

a more modest American role in international affairs. But that is an outcome that should be reached through discussion

It's going to take a lot more than that. It's not just the hypocrisy, no one trusts a liar, a gaslighter, a betrayer and we've demonstrated we're all those things. It will take generations of sane US leadership to undo the damage that's been done to our reputation in just the last 20 years.

[–]Maniak🥃😾 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The federal government has certainly been making the case that maybe it should simply be deleted, to end up with 50 small countries. At least those would be less of a threat to the rest of the world :)

Other than that, at the very least, the entire AIPAC pyramid would have to be thrown out of there, and that's already a tall order.