you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Interesting; I didn't know about these.

Texas

The opposition has a very good point in principle:

When you block reasonable regulations, you not only hurt people who suffer from the unregulated action, you also set the stage for a backlash and far more unreasonable regulations.

But I'm not at all convinced by their examples. The dairy one in particular sounds like the right outcome.

More details at Ballotpedia

 

As for Maine, it seems much more clear-cut. There are obviously concerns about vulnerabilities that should be addressed anyway, but I don't see any reason to oppose this unless you're a corporate lobbyist.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the Texas link, good point:

Judith McGeary, executive director for Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, said there is a real problem with cities over regulating on big and small farms. But the amendment, she and her organization believe, is unnecessary and would give the agriculture business sector “immense” amounts of protection that would empower larger farms.

The alliance is a national organization that advocates for independent family farmers.

(and your second link is the website of this organization, great find)