you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ageingrockstar 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Now tell me again how Israel doesn't qualify.

I don't think it's a useful label to apply to Israel; much too conflicting seeing as Jews were some of the victims of Nazism.

Instead, it makes more sense to draw out the parallels between Nazism and Zionism (and look at, for instance, the support that Nazism gave to Zionism). Each of these is the label (and attendant ideology), that these evil regimes applied to themselves and I don't think it makes sense to subsume Zionism under Nazism (especially when Zionism has spanned a much greater time period than Nazism, from the end of the 19th century right through till today).

[–]Maniak🥃😾[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are distinctions of course, but for all intents and purposes, the similarities far outweigh the differences, and what Nazis are about is way more easily understood by most people than Zionists.

It's a simplification but it does the job. As to the jewish 'factor', there's just no way to avoid zionists using it to turn any criticism into an antisemitic smear and justify them doing whatever they want. If anything, putting the Nazi label on zionists can help to highlight the fact that this isn't about jews, palestinians or any particular religion. Never has been.

It's about a group of people believing themselves to be a superior race, with some magical mandate to take over land and destroy "subhuman" populations via any means.

A middle-ground would be to simply call them nazionists, similar to ukrainazis.