you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bucetao6969Im a guest here. Do not take my opinion as of a community member 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Was it a good idea for people at that moment to get vaccinated?

[–]BlackhaloPurity Pony: Pусский бот 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Maybe if you were over 70, or had a serious co-morbidity like diabetes. Otherwise, probably not. The actual jab, if you got one of the 50% that were actually live, did not do a good job at all at preventing or mitigating COVID.

[–]bucetao6969Im a guest here. Do not take my opinion as of a community member 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So what was its point anyway? Or just failed to do what it wanted to do?

[–]BlackhaloPurity Pony: Pусский бот 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It was only effective for 3 months at best, and the virus would mutate too fast as well. Plenty of biologists and immunologists were saying that it was a fool's errand from the start.

[–]bucetao6969Im a guest here. Do not take my opinion as of a community member 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Plenty of biologists and immunologists were saying that it was a fool's errand from the star

What did these biologists suggest then?

[–]BlackhaloPurity Pony: Pусский бот 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)