Excerpt:

THEY KNEW.

That is the big story of the week, spreading fast in the online “health freedom” space, and getting lots of engagements. Several major presenters have picked up the story and run with it.

In investigative reporting, they knew is always the big one.

It’s like a cycle of myths: it happens over and over, the world over, in every situation where the public is at some risk, and corporate or public officials pretend they are not.

They knew.

That is the real crime — and the pearl of great price for any investigative reporter or trial lawyer: to prove that they knew. Ladies and gentlemen of the imaginary jury, the defendant knew, and did not stop.

To prove that someone knew — a fact usually established by their own documents — is the difference between negligence versus an intentional act. There’s a word for it in legal practice: scienter, which means knowingly and intentionally. It’s related to “science,” meaning that their own scientific findings prove they knew.

In fact, the doctrine of intent goes so far as to say it means, They knew or should have known.

Daily Clout Report on CDC’s Early Knowledge of Heart Damage and Blood Clots from ‘Covid Vaccines’

On Sept. 20, Amy Kelly and attorney Edward Berkovich reported in Daily Clout that they had in their possession 46 pages of emails obtained from the CDC under the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), proving that they knew.

What did federal officials know? Daily Clout reports that they knew the “covid vaccine” could cause myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and thrombosis, a blood clot disorder. According to the report, CDC knew. Dr. Anthony Fauci knew, and said the risk was minimal — and claimed that the risk of heart disease from “covid itself” was far worse.

Pres. Biden knew; the White House requested more information about the issues.

What Daily Clout is saying is that they all knew the “covid vaccine” was potentially a “clot shot,” as it’s sometimes called in health freedom circles.

...

Foreknowledge of Danger at the Height of the Vaccine Mandates

The reported date range of the CDC emails in question is May 24-25, 2021 — at the very height of the “vaccine” push. The implication is that there was foreknowledge that the injections would kill people while officials were making the loudest claims for the necessity and perfect safety of the drugs. If true, that is a form of homicide.

Millions of people around the world were mandated to take the shots, often as many as three or more of them, or face loss of their jobs and social standing. They wrere given to children, the elderly, and those with compromised immunity. And if these interviews I did in New York City a month later than the emails mean anything, the public was convinced of “safe and effective.” People wanted to get “back to normal.”

Presently, CDC reports that it knows of 36,173 deaths from the “covid vaccine,” associated with specific dates and specific batches. They also admit being aware of 209,682 adverse health events following the shot that were so serious, they required hospitalization. As is well known today, many of these deaths and hospitalizations involved cardiac issues and blood clots, as well as brain bleeds.

Now, we’re being presented with evidence that federal officials knew this could occur, or were at least aware of the potential issue. Because they knew or should have known, it was an intentional act.

As we learned during Watergate half a century ago, the big question is, “What did the president know, and when did he know it?”

Let’s take a little tour of what else “they knew.” I only know of one situation in all of chemical history where there was criminal liability — and the charges were mail fraud and wire fraud, not poisoning anyone.

They Knew at Love Canal

...

Monsanto Knew that PCBs Cause Liver Damage and Cancer

...

Monsanto Knew About Dioxin in Lysol

..

Monsanto Knew the World was Contaminated with its PCBs

...

And the list goes on and on ...