And just like in America, the elected representatives make angry noises, but seem to have neither the will nor the ability to forcibly extract answers from these filibustering frauds.

 

“The question that I asked was can you explain why the vaccine causes myocarditis. Yes or no?” he asked.

After Thiru tried to deflect one more time by citing the jabs’ allegedly justifiable benefit-risk ratio, Rennick gave up.

“You clearly don’t understand the pathway, do you? Because you can’t explain it,” the senator said.

 

Why does a senator have to give up?

Why can't committee chairmen immediately hold witnesses in contempt, and confine them pending satisfactory answers?

 

When Antic asked Clarke what Moderna’s overall rate of serious vaccine injury was for its COVID product, the doctor admitted that he doesn’t know “the actual rates of adverse events.”

“You don’t have the rates of adverse events in front of you?” Antic asked incredulously...

Clarke again claimed that Moderna’s trials showed no safety concerns and “no imbalance of serious adverse events of special interest or deaths between the vaccine group and the placebo group.”

“I think we’re wasting our time here,” Antic responded in disgust.

 

Yes, that much is clear. The question is why.

 

Dr. Thiru also refused to give a straight answer to Sen. Matthew Canavan, when he was asked if Pfizer tested its COVID-19 vaccine prior to the rollout to see if it stopped or reduced transmission of the disease.

 

Naturally.

 

Oh, just as a footnote, hardly worth mentioning:

 

During the hearing, one of the Pfizer representatives admitted that during the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer employees received a different shot than the general public.

 

Don't you dare ask why. You're not a conspiracy theorist, are you?