you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

All fine and dandy but that wasn't the point of the article which was a deep critique of how the CIA has lost agents and compromised integrity of those in the field trying stunts that don't work and trying to maintain relevancy when they've lost all their skills.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fair point - though regarding CIA - for all of its abuses - it is nonetheless so deeply embedded in the US Intelligence Community that a US President won't have any significant impact on it. That would require a substantial Congressional bill, after which other intelligence agencies would take its place. This is the realpolitic problem of dealing with the CIA and Pentagon.

[–]Centaurea 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

a US President won't have any significant impact on it.

We know what happened to the last US President who tried.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not really