you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]YoMamma 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Essentially a plug for RFK Jr, and for Scott Ritter, who still wants to be relevant. If RFK can win the DNC nomination, great. If not, he'll draw votes away from electable candidates.

CIA criticisms are straw dogs. Anyone can cherry pick items that seem to point to CIA overreach. And most of us know virtually nothing about the CIA's actual activities. Easy target. I also hate that kind of non-Democratic agency. But also familiarize yourself with the US Intelligence Community, in which the CIA is an ineluctable, inexpugnable, irrefragable unit. All powerful countries have these intelligence units. Kill one, another will rise. If RFK Jr and his followers want to be taken seriously, they'll need to understand realpolitik stratagies.

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Or maybe it's the fact that we do Deep State analysis because that's an organ that has done plenty to countries with their own agenda

And why should we learn realpolitik when those are the ways of Henry Kissinger, who usually missed a step or two, as they destroyed Cambodia or Vietnam for his agenda?

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

why should we learn realpolitik

We should understand it because it's still used.

Kissinger is a war criminal and should always be remembered as one, and for drawing the US into Israel's disasterous geopolitics that continues to destabilize several countries. You have to understand evil in order to deal with it.

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

All fine and dandy but that wasn't the point of the article which was a deep critique of how the CIA has lost agents and compromised integrity of those in the field trying stunts that don't work and trying to maintain relevancy when they've lost all their skills.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Fair point - though regarding CIA - for all of its abuses - it is nonetheless so deeply embedded in the US Intelligence Community that a US President won't have any significant impact on it. That would require a substantial Congressional bill, after which other intelligence agencies would take its place. This is the realpolitic problem of dealing with the CIA and Pentagon.

[–]Centaurea 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

a US President won't have any significant impact on it.

We know what happened to the last US President who tried.

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not really

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They each are factions and their growth has been out of control since Truman but it's not impossible.

The FBI grew as the fantasy of J. Hoover and needs to be tamped down and reigned in by the Department of Justice.

We should re- look at the Churchill Committee on Assassinations and really get on all of them honestly.