you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Centaurea 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The son of US Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy also said that if he became president, he would order the Justice Department to investigate the editors and publishers of medical journals for "lying to the public."

Needless to say, there would be obvious First Amendment concerns to such an investigation.

Got to laugh at the irony -- or is it hypocrisy? -- in this statement by the so-called "journalist" who wrote this bit of propaganda.

Over the past few years, we've been inundated with government and media fear-mongering about "misinformation" and "disinformation", and have seen numerous ongoing attempts by both the federal government and the corporate media to shut people up in order to keep them from "lying to the public".

Where was the author and her concern about the First Amendment then?

[–]FThumbStay thirsty, my friends 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Needless to say, there would be obvious First Amendment concerns to such an investigation.

The 1st Am would only apply if he pledged to shut them down, like they did to vax skeptics.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think US v. Alvarez clearly demonstrated that Alito, Kagan, and Thomas wouldn't have a problem here. That's 3 already.

edit: let me revise my initial optimism. Sadly I think a hypothetical US v. JAMA goes down 5-4 on the wrong side. (We'd prolly only get Barrett.)

edit 2: Y'know, another case impinging on First Amendment interpretations and criminal conduct was recently decided 7-2. Skimming Jackson's dissent, looks like I was right to place her (and Sotomayor) against RFK Jr; she's avoiding constitutional avoidance (heh) in a thoroughly unconvincing manner to reach her position.