you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm a turtle in my flair.

Really? <goes to look> So you do. Is there a point in bringing that fact to the fore?

Don't get hung up on the turtle thing.

What a great idea. Have you suggested that to all those people running around, all hair-on-fire about it?

If you eliminated the "turtle", then you'd still be able to stand up on your own two feet, and fight. Right?

In case you haven't noticed, or forgot I already said it, I do not have control of the Turtle Button.
So, I do not have The Turtle. Therefore I do have to "stand up on [my] own two feet, and fight." If you want to look at it that way.

Why do you view it as fighting? You seem to have all this warfare framing in your speech.

For example, this "suing for peace" that you keep saying that you are trying to do.

I was interested in a bit of disambiguation on your use of the term. In the warfare framing that you seem to fall back on, "suing for peace" tends to have four main definitions:

  • Negotiations for the conditions to cease hostilities, sued for by one who has the ability to cease the aforementioned hostilities
  • Negotiations to begin the negotiations
  • A surrender, with a request for terms of the surrender, or
  • A demand for the other side to surrender, and obey.

Which of those four is closest to your "suing for peace"?

It would not look too good on your part if you actually meant one of those definitions but allowed everyone here to make the assumption that you meant one of the others....

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Protip: Sometimes, that something is not responded to is more insightful than any actual response that was made.