you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bootylicious 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

None of what I've mentioned above has been in the sidebar (nothing about turtles, types of bans, taxes, temporary bans, permanent bans, etc).

I'm also not claiming this is a big deal. I'm merely pointing out the problems, and getting a lot of false responses (like yours in this case) that I've had to respond to.

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

(nothing about turtles, types of bans, taxes, temporary bans, permanent bans, etc).

The PSA one does in regards to the attitude to folks that do things...

Why is this on a Sanders sub also reflects how we feel.

False responses

Well that's certainly a new one. I mean... I'm typing out the letters and giving a response that accurately points to information in regards to how people moderate and do things in a certain manner. Might be a bit rigid to claim it's fake news because somehow it doesn't feel like it points to everything you want when it does...

🤔

[–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Those two items are not in the sidebar. Perhaps someone should put them in the sidebar.

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It's in the moderation dedicated post

[–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Also not in the side panel - or at least I don't see it there. The persistence with this issue - that visitors should automatically, magically understand WatB's unusual shell rules and whatever - indicates to me that those arguing with me about this have some form of autism. If WatB is not explicit regarding shell or ban requirements, they have no argument when shelled users complain.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

have some form of autism

Damn. We need more Bingo Cards.

Responded to wrong person. Apologies.

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The only reason to attack anyone's character is to ignore your own ignorance and pedantry by not following the posts laid out in the sidebar outside of what you believe.

In short, you continuously come to conclusions before you get facts.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

...have some form of autism

Damn. We need more Bingo Cards.

[–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

not at all

I've merely explained in numerous ways what's wrong with shelling users...

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You hold onto your belief while ignoring anything in the post.

[–]risistill me 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

None of what I've mentioned above has been in the sidebar (nothing about turtles, types of bans, taxes, temporary bans, permanent bans, etc).

More missing the point. Inuma did not say what you mentioned is on the sidebar. He suggested that you read the sidebar. Maybe--just a guess--he thinks you need to understand what this sub is about.

I don't know why I am trying to explain anything. My bad. I won't do it again.

[–]bootylicious 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No

He said:

Read some of the stuff on our sidebar

We've been through some ish.

In response to this: "TEMPORARY bans for REPEATED dickish behaviour is at issue, not permanent bans for a few comments. (That's giving someone a second chance to be less dickish.)"

And it's NOT in the sidebar, ffs.