all 9 comments

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

need sanctions on china, venezuela did nothing wrong tho

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

We don't have any business imposing sanctions on anyone. If they're to be imposed at all, it should be under the auspices of the UN and in compliance with its charter and the human rights proclamations the members of that body have signed onto. And if the UN is not going to operate in this role and rein in rogue countries like the US, then it should be disbanded because its stated "mission" is totally meaningless.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

tough to do with UN, they have no power, China is in the UN and won't want to put sanctions on themselves.

Ok disband them. A country like USA can and should put their own sanctions on china though.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The UN would have power if the member nations acted morally and consistently with what they said they were for by joining it. It won't be disbanded, I know that, but it should if it's not going to fulfill the function it was created to fulfill. It's become a honeypot, because there is nothing good under the sun that some fucking power-hungry greedmeisters won't take over and corrupt.

The US is not and SHOULD NOT BE the policemen of the world, we have repeatedly shown how hypocritical and morally unfit we are for the task. Failing to call out our government for killing civilians, whether it's with bombs or by starving them, is a stain on the soul of Americans and it sure as hell isn't what the majority of us would vote for with eyes wide open. Sadly, people only pay attention at election time and even then, only superficially. It's not and has never been about Americans' security, it's driven by greed and a lust for power. And Americans' complacency, failure to exercise the diligence we were warned was necessary, has allowed things to come to their present pass.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

sanctions doesn't really mean being a police man, it's just not rewarding them for bad behavior. It's like boycotting, it works. Hence why some are so against it.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

it's just not rewarding them for bad behavior.

It's PUNISHING them for "crimes" we are by no means the arbiter on, nor should we be because we regularly violate the human rights of our own population. All it's really about is punishing the civilian population so badly they'll rise up and overthrow the government so we can put our US-friendly quisling in power.

Here's what the Caesar Sanctions are doing to the Syrian people:

Like the mysterious figure it is named for, the Caesar sanctions bill is the product of an elaborate deception by shadowy US- and Gulf-backed operatives. Instead of protecting Syrian civilians, the unilateral measures are driving them towards hunger and death.

Sorry, only sociopaths would think that is acceptable.

Edit to add: not to mention it violates international law. We're trying to be both cop and criminal, no wonder we're sociopaths.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yes it is, sorry

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the article (bold added):

Sanctions are restrictions on trade, finance and travel that are technically supposed to be used to punish certain actors — governments, corporations or individuals — only when they are convicted by a body, usually the United Nations, of committing a crime. But over the past few decades, the United States has increasingly issued its own so-called sanctions outside of any legal process as a tool to punish or retaliate against almost 40 countries representing a third of the global population.

.

While the United States calls these ad hoc actions “sanctions,” they are more accurately described as unilateral coercive measures — state actions that violate human rights and multiple international laws. These unilateral coercive measures create an economic blockade that prevents targeted countries from, for example, having access to their assets that are abroad, conducting financial transactions or transporting goods.

.

Economic blockades prevent countries from purchasing basic necessities such as food, medicines and equipment, creating scarcity and driving up prices. This leads to preventable suffering and deaths that are less visible than when bombs are dropped but are just as deadly. For example, the Center for Economic Policy and Research found that these U.S. “sanctions” contributed to the deaths of 40,000 Venezuelans between 2017 and 2018. Unilateral coercive measures have more recently prevented Venezuela from paying for cancer treatment for patients who were sent abroad to receive specialized care, leaving hundreds of patients stranded.

.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States’ unilateral coercive measures have blocked the purchase of medical equipment such as ventilators, medications and even vaccinations through the World Health Organization’s COVAX program designed to make vaccines more available globally. This is why the United Nations Secretary General António Guterres wrote to the leaders of G-20 countries in March 2020, stating, “I am encouraging the waiving of sanctions imposed on countries to ensure access to food, essential health supplies, and COVID-19 medical support. This is the time for solidarity not exclusion.”

.

As nations around the world responded to the COVID-19 crisis by sharing medical supplies and personnel to combat the pandemic, the Trump administration issued more unilateral coercive measures. This forced impacted countries to find ways around the economic blockade. Some countries bypassed U.S.-dominated financial institutions by trading in currencies other than the dollar or using alternative platforms. Some — such as Mexico, which used its navy to deliver medical supplies and other necessities to Cuba — have openly defied the U.S. blockade. (good for Mexico!)

.

It appears that is more important to the United States government to spend money on protecting the interests and profits of its transnational corporations than it is to roll back the economic blockades to protect public health. So far, the Biden administration has only removed a few of the hundreds of new unilateral coercive measures imposed by President Trump.