REDDIT MOD U/DREWIEPOODLE offering a 13 year old child estrogen ("SUPER GIRL JUICE") shots in his apartment, admitting that he does this OFTEN. This is grooming.

submitted by fuckupaddams from imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fuckupaddams[S] 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

Giving 13 year old boys unprescribed estrogen out of your house is the same as giving hookers prescription pills? What are you talking about?

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

I'm saying this is both illegal and super sketchy. If you think about it: druggies give hookers prescription pills in exchange for sex; this could be a similar situation.

I don't see how my point wasn't obvious, to be honest.

[–]Intuit 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The difference is that this involves minors. With adults (hookers) they at least have some chance of being able to make an informed choice of their own agency.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not all hookers are adults.

[–]fuckupaddams[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah my bad but it was a bit unclear what your point was.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That happens.

[–]Godhelpus90 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think it's because it's not literally the same, it's just a very similar situation. Your point is taken though. That mod is a bonafide nonce and should be in fucking prison.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They should.

[–]absoluteblasphemy 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

And people wonder why we have a problem with TIMs moderating. All “””Amelia””” has done since he got here is apologise for trans people’s shitty behaviour. The last comment I saw from him was defending pedo tran Aimee.

Amazing, great job. Not trying to change the tone at all.

[–]Comatoast 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

That's odd, and out of character. I've only seen Amelia talk about how Aimee/other pedo mods that are trans have a protectionary screamer pod of being able to yell bigotry. I'm not denying the existence, but I would want to see it first to judge for myself. 've seen the talks on being trans, but wanting to defend yourself or make sure that others don't think that you're like that I kind of understand.

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's odd, and out of character.

u/absoluteblasphemy is a troll spreading blatant lies about me. He's probably LXXXVIII.

I've only seen Amelia talk about how Aimee/other pedo mods that are trans have a protectionary screamer pod of being able to yell bigotry.

I'm one of the only people — not including u/absoluteblasphemy (hmmmm) — who openly promotes using the death penalty against pedophiles.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

That's odd, and out of character

Not sure y'all are taking into account how puritanical Amelia is.

When she said

This is literally the same thing as giving hookers some of your prescription pills

She meant it was a really bad thing cause she hates hookers and drugs, and even alcohol. Pretty sure sex too. And I agree with her pedos should be killed or castrated.

Think this is a misunderstanding.

[–]Comatoast 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wait, who? That's the point that I was trying to make, that I've never seen Amelia defend pedoshit, and anything that I saw on s/all posted about Aimee Challenor was only bringing up that reddit mods were able to pull the trans card. I never saw Amelia defending them, so I considered the post that I replied to by absoluteblasphemy as suspect regarding that, saying that it was odd and out of character. It's prodding for proof/more information, because god knows I've had my own words taken out of context and used against me on here, so I want to make sure that they actually had evidence and not cherry picked bullshit to support only their argument and defame Amelia.

I read what I typed a few times now, and I don't see where I could have come off in another way. Is there a way that I worded things that was wonky?

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

All “””Amelia””” has done since he got here is apologise for trans people’s shitty behaviour.

So comparing them to a criminal is apologizing for their behavior? I literally said its no better than giving a prostitute some of your prescription pills for sex. You're literally gaslighting to push an agenda (the same agenda as LXXVIII).

I spend hours a day removing advertisements, a robot that makes a new account every time it gets banned, and the LXXXVIII troll — and all I get in return is a twenty-seven day-old account (possibly affiliated with the aforementioned troll) spreading blatant lies about me?

The last comment I saw from him was defending pedo tran Aimee.

That is 100% a lie! You're a gaslighting troll. Just because I refer to her as "her" doesn't mean I like her — matter of fact: I hate her; she's a disgusting pedophile! I'm the one who gets criticized for promoting the death penalty for pedos; I don't see you doing that...

What I said was that Reddit only fired her because she made the powermods angry; do you really think Reddit cares about censoring commoners? These are the people who banned r/the_donald for supporting Trump.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I spend hours a day removing advertisements, a robot that makes a new account every time it gets banned, and the LXXXVIII troll

To sidestep this drama, could you be specific about exactly what the spam and ads you're willing to remove look like?

What about those "buy prescription drugs with no prescription" accounts?

Brand new accounts promoting some random Indian or wherever business?

The spammers are usually more blatant with the flood of posts. It would be nice to have a clear guide to know what's worth our time (and yours) to report.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What about those "buy prescription drugs with no prescription" accounts?

Yeah, that's definitely spam.

Brand new accounts promoting some random Indian or wherever business?

Yep. We get a lot of those (and Australians for some reason).

The spammers are usually more blatant with the flood of posts. It would be nice to have a clear guide to know what's worth our time (and yours) to report.

If it's an ad: report it; we'll work out if it breaks the rules or not when we see it.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Kek