Two remedies shown to bind to and facilitate the removal of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

While they both were beneficial therapeutics to Covid infection and the attack against them were completely insane, especially considering their long history and history of similar drug families...there is no reason to think they could possibly help with either of these problems. Some problems cannot be corrected. The only way is not not lie to people in the first place. That I-recover crap is such a lame and predatory con.

You have to remember that these types of gene therapy were ban from use on humans, specifically because the well known high rate of transcription error and how they caused sterilization in animal test subjects. We were lied to and told that they had fixed this. We were also lied to and the whole S protein was not in the vaccine, in the begging because injecting people with the whole weapon of the virus would be overt genocidal manslaughter. They were warned by a huge collection of scientists to not include the whole S protein before the vaccines were done.

Everything about this vaccine was a lie. The most recent release of Pfizer papers from the courts shows that Pfizer knew from the some of the first trials that natural immunity was equal to the efficiency of the vaccine. They submitted this information to regulators and through them to governments.

Governments lied about this. The CDC highlighted the flawed Kentucky study, showing unvaccinated were 2.34 times more likely to be re-infected. This was based on 6 o 8 months of data, where half of that they had no data for the vaccinated as they just rolled out. It was a fraud. They removed the 2nd data table from the study after the pre-print, which showed the weekly re-infection rate comparison of unvaccinated re-infection rates to zeros for half of the months. The CDC published this on their sight as their crowning highlight. It suggested that for those 6 months are so, showed how bad natural immunity was and referenced the study many times.

They must have gotten scared, because you will never find that study any more, rather on the pre-print. It was completely erased from the internet and replaced with a substitute, with the change of being a comparison of only2 months. This changed the title, the content, and of course the meaning. It still is missing the 2nd data table. Dozens of websites had the study replaced with the changed one. All archive.org wayback archives referencing it were erased or like CDC and prominent health websites had the entire history replaced with the substitute study. Reddit erased all trace of the post and discussions on the pre-print.