use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
● /s/Agenda21_Agenda2030 ● /s/ClassWar ● /s/ClimateSkeptics ● /s/Coronavirus ● /s/Corporatocracy ● /s/CorruptScience ● /s/CultureWars ● /s/FoodCrises ● /s/FuckMasks ● /s/LockdownSkepticism ● /s/Pushback ● /s/ResistanceAnalysis ● /s/Surveillance ● /s/Technocracy ● /s/Tyranny ● /s/Unrest ● /s/VaccineInjuries ● /s/VaccineSkepticism
Ask to be co-moderator or earn an invitation.
CSS by /u/JasonCarswell
Lancet Study on Covid Vaccine Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused by Vaccine – Journal Removes Study Within 24 Hours
submitted 9 months ago by [deleted] from dailysceptic.org
[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (0 children)
Preprint site, deems study wrong, before it can be reviewed to find out if it is wrong.
That is not how this is supposed to work.
You should have seen the crazy pre-prints faking vaccine efficiency late in the game, but still passing, somehow, then being pushed by the CDC. Some were so bad, that the originals were removed from hundreds of websites and the histories were scrubbed from archive.org....
...like the Kentucky study finding you 2.34 time more likely to get re-infected if not vaccinated, which originally was a period of 6 months and included a table showing it comparing zero data of vaccinated to un-vaccinated with data for 4.5 months. After being touted by the CDC for a year, they removed the data table and changed the title to being about only 2 months. I guess someone who wasn't censored as much as me (thanks Reddit), pointed it out.
[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)