you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes but Title 9 explicitly frames it as male and female sex categories so even if you go with postmodern nonsense meanings for man and woman then SCOTUS should in theory uphold the protections.

[–]Jiminy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah they probably anticipated this nonsense when they made the law so they defined the terms they were using