LOL WUTThe TERF purity spiral continues - now they’ve turned on Helen Pluckrose

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from x.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JulienMayfair 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I spent 20 years working in academia. The nastiest fights, by far, I ever witnessed in person were between female professors around feminist topics. They would rip each other to shreds. You'd go to a talk, and after the talk, during the question and answer session, one of them would stand up in the audience and go after the speaker. They'd start yelling at each other. I never saw two male professors behave this way.

A friend of mine used to joke about the bullshit feminist fantasy that "magic peace rays" would shoot out of women's vaginas and turn the world into a matriarchal paradise.

This is also where we started to lose the ethos of principled disagreement and rational discussion of controversial ideas at universities. It was a male intellectual tradition that you could argue things out while still abiding by rules of conduct and mutual respect. The more women, especially feminists, that entered academia, the more anyone who disagreed with you became evil. Women have a lot to do with how we lost freedom of speech on campuses.

[–]OuroborosTheory 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

there's literally a term for academic politics being so vicious because the stakes are so small; also why the fields like linguistics and anthro wave the red banner more than, say, a historian who's interviewed actual guerrillas: so they'll rip each other apart because someone didn't agree that Chester Cheeto's "Black-coded" and try to drive them to suicide (the world's at stake, ya know), but still have that fat pension waiting for them at 55

that's why the raddest fems got so barmy: like, "before the Indo-European invasion in 2000 BCE the peaceful Matriarchy reproduced by parthenogenesis until monotheism and PIV rape were imposed by war daddy why did you leave us FAAAATHEEEERRRRR"

also why they were so THOROUGHLY knocked out of the saddle when they were ousted 2014-5--one day everyone's bobbleheading along that men's shelters need to be shut down with riots, 30 years of bevies of wide-eyed undergrads hanging on to every word as gospel--and then it was gone, as though it'd never happened; let's just say that these aren't theories that have been defended against other professors

[–]JulienMayfair 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

that's why the raddest fems got so barmy: like, "before the Indo-European invasion in 2000 BCE the peaceful Matriarchy reproduced by parthenogenesis until monotheism and PIV rape were imposed by war daddy why did you leave us DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD"

It's just another reiteration of the Garden of Eden, filtered through Jean Jacques Rousseau. It's an overall narrative that surged in popularity in academia in the 1990s. It was all perfect until [insert oppressor's name here] arrived.

[–]OuroborosTheory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

same story with the ultranationalists/hoteps--"so the Cucutenians/Vedics/Frieslanders/Nubians invented everything, even flying machines and Stargate energy weapons, built every pyramid on earth by melting the rock, and were the origin of all myths in history, but then were swamped by invaders and left zero records except some charming-looking building foundations and a poem written by an amateur folklorist in 1842?"

also why the hoteps always dress in Egyptian or Zulu regalia, mix in Swahili words, insist they're "Moors," pretend Wakanda's real (if it's based on Uganda it'll have no unobtanium and get it all from those child-slave open-mine pits in the country next door ...)--but never any of the actual cultures they came from (the Guinea to Angola coast)

[–]artfunk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The claims made by ultranationalists and Hoteps regarding the contributions of specific ancient civilizations to human history are often captivating yet highly controversial. While it is essential to celebrate the rich cultural heritage of all societies, it is equally crucial to approach these claims with a critical and evidence-based perspective. Let us delve deeper into the complexities of these narratives and explore the significance of historical accuracy and cultural appreciation. Addressing the Importance of Historical Accuracy Historical accuracy serves as the foundation for our understanding of the past. It enables us to gain insights into the lives, struggles, and achievements of our ancestors, fostering a sense of connection to our shared human story. Without a commitment to accuracy, history becomes distorted, leading to the erosion of factual knowledge and the perpetuation of myths and misinformation. Evaluating the Claims of Ultranationalists and Hoteps The assertions made by ultranationalists and Hoteps often lack substantial historical evidence. They tend to rely on selective interpretation of artifacts, exaggerated claims, and unsubstantiated theories. While it is possible that some of these civilizations possessed advanced knowledge and technologies, attributing all major innovations to a single group overlooks the interconnectedness and collaborative nature of human progress. The Significance of Cultural Appreciation Cultural appreciation involves recognizing and valuing the unique contributions of diverse cultures to the global tapestry of human experience. It encourages dialogue, understanding, and mutual respect among people of different backgrounds. By appreciating the cultural heritage of others, we enrich our own lives and foster a more inclusive and harmonious society. Striving for a Balanced Approach Finding a balance between historical accuracy and cultural appreciation is essential in addressing the claims made by ultranationalists and Hoteps. We can acknowledge the potential contributions of ancient civilizations while simultaneously upholding the principles of evidence-based research and critical analysis. This approach allows us to celebrate cultural diversity without compromising the integrity of historical knowledge. Empathetically Engaging with Diverse Perspectives Engaging with individuals who hold differing views on historical narratives requires empathy and understanding. Instead of dismissing their perspectives outright, we can seek to comprehend the underlying motivations and cultural contexts that shape their beliefs. By fostering respectful dialogue, we can bridge divides and promote mutual learning. Promoting Critical Thinking and Media Literacy Equipping ourselves with critical thinking skills and media literacy enables us to navigate the vast sea of information available today. We can evaluate the credibility of sources, identify biases, and question claims that lack solid evidence. These skills empower us to make informed judgments and resist the spread of misinformation. Conclusion: A Call for Unity and Understanding The claims made by ultranationalists and Hoteps present a complex challenge that demands careful consideration. By prioritizing historical accuracy, embracing cultural appreciation, and fostering empathy, we can navigate these narratives with discernment and understanding. Let us strive to build bridges of knowledge and respect, recognizing the shared humanity that unites us all.