use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
LOL WUTWhen people are so desperate to call a celebrity a paedo that they inadvertently call for adult women to be treated like children.
submitted 7 months ago by ClassroomPast6178 from x.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago* (2 children)
Kinda my point.
In the rush to label men as predators people are robbing above-the-age-of-consent women of their agency.
They’ve been doing it to Leonardo Dicaprio for ages, making out that his dating of <25-year olds is some kind of indication that he’s a predator. (He might be, but not just because he dates young women).
[–]Haylstorm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (0 children)
Like it's weird he keeps going for them but let's be real anyone involved there knows the trade off they're getting is his fame. They know what they're getting into so it's weird to put more on that than it being an agreement that makes both parties happy. They're legal and haven't known him beforehand so I'm confident there's no funny business there.
Now if we're talking about someone that's been talking to someone since they were thirteen and now they're in a relationship right when the person is of age? Suspicious and gross. Not illegal but not exactly something anyone would see favourably. But there are a lot of obvious differences between the two and I do think acting like they're the same could potentially muddy the waters for actual predators.
[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago (0 children)
Exactly. It's classical sexism. Women being objects without agency.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Haylstorm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)