you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]makesyoudownvote 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I get where you are coming from, however I definitely think there is validity in fine tuning distinctions and precision in language.

In my opinion one thing the TRAs won't admit that is ironically crux to their entire argument is that gender is still BASED on sex.

In my opinion, gender is a set of conventions, protocols, and behaviors evolved to be optimal for a given sex.

So it's kind of like software vs hardware. You can run OSX on PC, but it won't run optimally, you will run into some compatibility issues and lose key functionality of the software. Hell nothing is even stopping you from trying to create your own O.S. But it sure isn't going to be as fully developed and thought out as the main ones.

That's the distinction between sex and gender imo.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In my opinion, gender is a set of conventions, protocols, and behaviors evolved to be optimal for a given sex.

Gender was made up by a pedo named Dr John Money to convolute a binary set of sex.

Sex is precise language.