you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AriShekelsteinDDS 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

“I made this massive unilateral decision. Why won’t my girlfriend give up her identity in order to make me feel more secure in mine?”

How do more people not see the common element of narcissism/extreme selfishness/extreme entitlement present among many of these freaks?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

She fucked her body up, she can never go back, so she’s, to use Helen Joyce’s analogy, like those Japanese soldiers on desert islands still fighting the Second World War in the 1960s. She’ll never give up because then she will have to confront the reality that she has mutilated herself, and that includes demanding everyone around her validates her because the truth is she needs to continually reinforce and qualify her decision to do stupid things to her body.

Helen Joyce applied it to the Munchausen’s Mummies, saying that because they’d harmed their children they would never give in or surrender to reality because to do so would be to admit that they did a monstrous thing to their own child. I think the same goes for troonettes and any troons who had their cocks cut off. They’ve gone all in on this nonsense and cannot afford to retreat.

Troons who have just had breast implants and oestrogen can go back, but troonettes who have taken testosterone can’t. They’ll be the Japanese soldiers fighting beyond the bitter end.

[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Helen Joyce applied it to the Munchausen’s Mummies, saying that because they’d harmed their children they would never give in or surrender to reality because to do so would be to admit that they did a monstrous thing to their own child.

Well, that's also the problem- the Munchausen's Mummies would never give in or submit because they ultimately don't care that they did a monstrous thing to their own child, all they care about is the woke points they'll get. Look at, for example, the mother of Jazz Jennings, where it becomes more and more obvious she's openly waiting for Jennings to 41 because it'd be a great series finale to the reality show, and she can spend the rest of her life professionally crying about Jennings's death and SHE gets to be special now for being the tragic little trooper who's child 41'ed and is trying to fulfill their legacy.

[–]BenitoGreen99[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Can troonettes who have that disgusting sausage-looking monstruosity facsimile of a 'penis' sewn(?) onto them ever get it removed (and have a normally functional female sex organ)?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From what I understand, no. Removing it will almost certainly leave them incontinent requiring multiple surgeries to treat. The urinary tract, in men and women, is actually a fairly delicate and easily damaged thing. The willingness of surgeons to mess with healthy urological anatomy boggles my brain, it really does, I spent some time with a reconstructive urologist (if you get a urological cancer and the treatment fucks you up or are born with an issue, he was the surgeon to see to get it fixed), and the stuff they can do down there to fix stuff is still really primitive, compared to the stuff they can do with hearts, guts and hands, even after 50 years of research.

[–]OuroborosTheory 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

deflate it like a Zodiac dinghy

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like to think of it as a Frankenweenie.