you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There’re so many levels to this shit.

It’s literally LGBT/progressive bingo.

I think WoS is a twat, but no one, no matter how shitty, should lose the ability to interact with the economy because of their opinions. The banks should be entirely apolitical and keep their cunty usurious mouths shut.

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When CBDC goes active, you will have zero freedoms anymore. Dissent will not be allowed.

[–]xoenix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What's wrong with WoS?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He’s a Scottish Nationalist. And he was quite unpleasant to people during the run up to Indyref.

[–]Datachost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He's a massive twat on certain things, but at least a dogged journalist on others. He was one of the few people blowing the whistle early on the SNP's finances

[–]ClassroomPast6178 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, he deserves praise for his reporting on those issues and it is clear what opinions got him debanked.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly, and because they're cunty and usurious, it's why they should protect this independence more.

Never forget, banks are just looking for a reason to take your money and will absolutely make one up if they have to. If people give the bank the opportunity to take someone like this's money freely, then they'll FIND a reason to take yours and everyone else who's involved with the bank's as well, even if that reason is just "I want a little more depth in my Uncle Scrooge pool."