'Drag mom' who mentored child queen jailed for felony child sex crimes

submitted by [deleted] from (dailymail.co.uk)

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]SerpensInferna 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Why is anyone at all surprised when this happens?

If only there was some kind of sign...

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Obviously she's innocent (because child sexual abuse is now a trans right) and what's more they're genociding her.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

A groomer turns out to be a paedo? I’m shocked and surprised!

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, this never happens.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trannies and child drag queen enablers and paedos are closely linked.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

To paraphrase a line from A Field of Dreams, "If you build it, they will come."

You're pushing the normalization of distinctly adult behaviors in children, so adults who crave being able to engage in certain forms of contact with children will naturally gravitate to causes and ideologies that look to give them what they desire. Especially if there's even a hint of the possibility that the criminal and social burden of their contact will be removed.

And, of course, the popular refrains are offered in response to yet another pervert being caught out; "this never happens," "it's only a few bad actors," "what about the Catholic Church?!?!" Never is it "well, it looks like the ideology we're pushing is drawing the chomos, maybe we should put the brakes on and reassess what we're actually trying to do here."

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I obviously agree with you on the trans ideology, or I wouldn't be posting this stuff here.

However, I would certainly apply the same thing to the catholic church and their ideology.

It would seem to me that if an ideology is extremely obsessed about sex stuff on either end of the spectrum, this often seems to lead to concerning sexual deviancy in a not insignificant subset of people in these groups (or perhaps attracting people to use the ideology as cover as you suggest). Either way I think this is a recipe for disaster regardless of whether the ideology is 'left' or 'right'. Severely repressing or overindulging sexual appetites can both be psychologically harmful when taken to unnatural extremes that deny our biology, and sex-based ideologies provide cover for deviants by transferring the focus away from the sexual deviance and onto something else

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

My biggest issue with their incessant referral to diddling priests is how they miss the glaringly obvious lessons drawn from those scandals; don't deny that it's happening, don't shuffle the offenders out of the spotlight, and don't provide them with protection from the rest of the organization/cause.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, a sane ideology would do just that, rather than attempting to justify it by pointing fingers at others. You have to have the moral high ground first

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As a non-catholic I'll just say I've never understood the reasoning behind why priests must be celibate. Seems utterly rediculous to me. Can't imagine a single biblical reasoning as to why a priest can't have a wife or a family.

I think that, couples with the confession booth and the access to hear about all the sins of their partitioners leads to the problem. Normal heterosexual men are typically going to find the idea of getting a wife and having a family to be more appealing than the priesthood, leaving the priesthood being more appealing to atypical men. For better or for worse there's nothing inherently wrong with wanting something else from life besides a traditional family, but it's certainly going to be more appealing to the sexually deviant who don't value that than otherwise I think. Then it's simply a matter of getting to hear all the "sins" of your partitioners that can let the predatory priest find the gay kids in their parish they can predate on with minimal risk.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a non-catholic I'll just say I've never understood the reasoning behind why priests must be celibate. Seems utterly rediculous to me. Can't imagine a single biblical reasoning as to why a priest can't have a wife or a family.

Disclaimer: Also not a catholic, or even a christian, but IIRC I believe their reasoning is because Jesus didn't marry or have kids, which would presumably make him celibate, and priests are supposed to be like him. I guess this overrides the earlier 'be fruitful and multiply' of the Old Testament as Jesus represents a 'new covenant', and the New Testament has precedence.

And yeah, I agree with your analysis, pedo's are always attracted to any position of authority with access to children such as this, and the celibacy component is going to further attract sexual deviants and weirdos who aren't interested in normal healthy sexual relationships as you say

[–]OuroborosTheory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

don't say "we're coming for your children," don't have teachers urge under-15s to keep sexual secrets from their parents, don't dive headfirst into the policies with the least public support, don't be a narcissist teenybopper ...

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

don't have teachers urge under-15s to keep sexual secrets from their parents

Man, one of the key warnings for kids to be aware of adults with bad intentions is when the adult uses some variation of "this is our secret, don't tell you parents" with regards to the kid's body. And then they (the adults) get all knotted up and offended when they're called groomers? Like, bitch, you're using standard, 101-level groomer moves!

[–]OuroborosTheory 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

again if they HAD enough brains that if they were dynamite they could blow their own ears off, they'd slow-roll it: the Ls and the Gs made any backlash look stupid by staying strictly age-appropriate 80s-00s--1st-3rd grade didn't go beyond "some kids have two moms/dads," 5th-middle school they brought it up more frankly--but alongside other stuff like "please wear deodorant" and "please stop humping the furniture"

no painting all the walls and carpets rainbow/trans taffy for a month or "I knew I was gay when I was 4"

[–]Wanderingthehalls 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Is Kelsey a cervix having woman or a prostate having woman?

[–]IMissPorn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Cervix-having, I think. But it's confusing as usual. Looking at that pic you'd think prostate for sure, but the article specifically says "biological female".

[–]beazer12beard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I still think it's a prostate having woman. It is a child sex crime after all, not exactly a female crime. Oregon is a state that allows you to change the sex on your driver's license at will.

Shows up as F in the jail system, which is presumably where the article gets their information. Just 5'5", but 303 lb. And is it really drag if you are female and "impersonating" a woman?

[–]Wanderingthehalls 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Kelsey definitely looks like a prostate haver in the unfiltered photos. Though maybe Kelsey is an AFAB transman who's taken T for years, and as a 'man' performed as a drag queen. So a woman identifying as a man pretending to be a woman?

I do think it would be interesting if at some less biased point in the future more investigation was done into the criminality of biological women on high doses of testosterone. I suspect there would be a rise in violent crimes above the usual average for women.

[–]beazer12beard 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I expect testosterone plays a role as well, while not being the whole picture.

But the idea of a woman identifying as a transman, then performing as a drag queen...really kind of spits in the face of the notion of gender dysphoria being some sort of crippling condition.

[–]Enemycupcake 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can see how a pervy straight girl type trans man would feel validated by doing drag. She wants to be a gay man so she does gay man things and feels more authentic.

[–]IMissPorn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can't say you're wrong for sure. But I tend to trust Andy Ngo to get the story straight. He's a fairly well known journalist, one of those who started out left-leaning but got fed up with "woke".

[–]SMCAB 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

SHOCKER!!!!!!

[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

GODDAMN FREAK SHOW