you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^[A] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Removed for advocating violence. Even if it's a joke, it could still get saidit in trouble with its hosts, domain registrars, CloudFlare, and in extreme cases, even the government.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Well sure, why not. It's only fair in [CURRENT YEAR] that folks be allowed to advocate for drag shows to children without fear for their personal safety from the roving gangs of post-wielding maniacs that freely stalk every street 🙄.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're allowed to criticize them, just don't advocate violence.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Even then, considering that if "they" said the exact same things said- hell, if they flat-out doxxed everyone here and made a call to action for every true member of their group to openly demand violence be done to that person, personally, they'd get no problems and might even get a medal for doing it, there's a problem.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They would definitely get banned for doing that.

Example: socks