you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Wait until they realize that calling tree or cat or something a gender invalidates those things' genders.

[–]usehernameredditgender 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I had a stroke reading this.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

If the snowflakes read it we could probably hear the gears screeching to a halt in their heads.

[–]usehernameredditgender 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

This ruling is so broad that if they actually apply it fairly (unlikely), they'd have to take down a metric fuckton of subs.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They already don't apply it fairly

[–]usehernameredditgender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe we could try pressuring them by mass reporting?

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Say hello to the banhammer then

[–]usehernameredditgender 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

F