Parler sent an email to all users with 300+ of their verified users CC'd instead of BCC'd. Now hundreds of people are replying and everyone has access to the personal emails of many verified users and Parler investors.

submitted by [deleted] from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]geoferdy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Smaller social media like Parler and Saidit should find a way to import all the posts made on censored sites like Twitter and Reddit but allow free commenting on top.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Like gab?

What ever happened to gab?

Oh right, they were too effective and were destroyed.

[–]Newzok 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Tale as old as time.

Now, the question is how and why this happens. And what heads should roll.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Unfortunately when a powerful group takes control of a society with as much technology as we have they get to use that technology to brainwash the masses. So when I tell you who it is you are far more likely to get triggered and turn against me rather than agree and work with me.

[–]Newzok 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Well I think I'm open minded enough to entertain any suggestion... If we can't say it here, where else is there! Is it (((them))) or someone else?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is only a few who are at the top, and a few more near the top whom the top trust, and a few more who those people need to trust in order to delegate task, etc. Everything that is made to happen serves the top. Everything that is allowed to happen can't threaten the top.

The evidence shows that (((those at the top))) only trust (((the next rung))) if they have the right (((lineage))).

So when power is used to do things that enforce the (((media/social media))) information hegemony who else could it be but (((them)))?

[–]MURDERINCORPORATED 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Believe me, saidit is operated by the same people that run Twitter and Facebook

[–]geoferdy 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

That would be like Starbucks secretly running a lemonade stand.

[–]jamesK_3rd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is probably referring to the backend.

Unless M3 setup a server rack in his basement on a business tier internet line, he is paying for vps in some storage facility. Those typically are running AWS or some other hosting service from Amazon, MS or meta.

There are some independent hosting companies, like nearly free speech, but a lot of them have started to use the services from the big boys or they're bought out by the big guys. Additionally, even if you self host, you need to setup a second server for DNS.. using almost any of the DNS services like dnsmaseeady etc has most of their backbone on AWS I've heard, another reason that when AWS goes down, it takes half the sites on the coasts down(unless you know the IP) with it