all 60 comments

[–]monkeymagic 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

a good 30 percent of the users here understand that left/right politics are for retarded children. i’m low balling, the actual number is likely higher.

[–]hfxB0oyA 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (15 children)

"Rational" wiki, you say?

[–]Bonn1770 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Peter Lispon founded Rationalwiki and of course, is a Jew.

[–]hfxB0oyA 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whatever. That's not my particular horse of choice to flog.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"OMG! OMG! THE JOOS!? 😲 RUN FOR THE HILLS BOYS! THEY'RE A COMIN' FER YA!"

Do have any evidence that Lipson is jewish other than your "jewdar"?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

it's a jewish surname, numbnuts.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lipson: English: patronymic from Lipp English: habitational name from Lipson in Devon which is possibly named from Old English hlīep ‘leap steep place’ + stān ‘stone’. It's a good old English name.

Lipson could also be a variant of Lipman or Lippman, which comes from Dutch: habitational name from a farm named Lipman or perhaps Lippink referring to a certain Lippo and his kin. Lippo is a pet form of an ancient Germanic personal name composed with the element leiba ‘offspring son’ or of the personal name Philip.

Imagine being so obsessed that you see THE JOOS in English, Dutch and German names.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OH NOES, ITS THE JOOOOOOOOOS!!!!1!!!!! RUN FOR THE HILLS!!!!

Lipson is an English name. These "Jews" you are afraid of, are they in the room with us now?

[–]Alienhunter 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's very rational. "Let's make a Wikipedia except more biased" Definitely firing on all cylinders.

Personally my favorite is Uncyclopedia, the information free encyclopedia.

https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Hippie

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hah. At least that site doesn't misrepresent itself.

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing rational about that Wiki it is left-leaning.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    It's rational to #believe all women. Because it is scientifically certain that women can't lie. This was proven by a woman scientist, which proves how true it is.

    By the way, I am a woman because I said I am. And you owe me $100 dollars because I am a woman. And this is definitely true because I am a woman and can't lie.

    [–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    you owe me $100 dollars

    Only if you're a black woman, it seems.

    [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    I see a lot of racism in that comment and not enough recognition your privilege through a recognize privilege payment facilitator.

    I'm afraid that increases your privilege liability by an extra $25 dollars. Pay now within the next 30 minutes and we'll toss in our "actually I'm gay so less liable" option absolutely free. Now you can claim to be LGBTQ by saying you don't "identify" with either gender while changing nothing about yourself or your lifestyle for the one time low low low payment of one human soul plus shipping and handling. Don't let this opportunity pass you by? What does.it profit a man if he keeps his sould but loses on privilege based oppression points? Why one soul of course, but you got that for free! That means it is worth $0. It's a steal!

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    There are some exceptions obviously, but this is largely an accurate portrayal of the majority of users here for a simple reason - with the exception of r/conspiracy, these are the subs that were banned on Reddit, providing one of the only incentives there is to use a reddit clone with a nonexistent user base instead. Now this doesn't describe me, but I am not surprised by the demographics of the few sites that allow relatively free speech having majority right-wing users. The majority of people right now trying to avoid censorship are conservative, although for most of US history it has been the other way around.

    [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Is it that different? I think you've always seen cases of the left censoring the left. Often because they fear the reaction of conservatives hurting their ability to implement policies?

    I think what you see now is a "communications cultural revolution" where the tech changed faster than the laws and the old left got totally supplanted by a new radical left that understood the new means of communication. It's like how when the printing press was invented it spurned revolutions across Europe.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Is it that different? I think you've always seen cases of the left censoring the left.

    I do think its different, the ACLU is actively against free speech in some instances which is unheard of in their history. They once defended the rights of the KKK to march. Not all leftists have supported free speech, but the people who have supported free speech have mostly been leftists and a few libertarians, with right wing christians always enacting censorship, and these roles have reversed. Progressives want a new morality, and (some) conservatives want to defend the old liberal values ironically enough, like free speech, and anti-war

    I think what you see now is a "communications cultural revolution" where the tech changed faster than the laws and the old left got totally supplanted by a new radical left that understood the new means of communication. It's like how when the printing press was invented it spurned revolutions across Europe.

    You might very well be right about this, it's a better explanation than anything else I have heard

    [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    The ACLU has definitely fallen far. I think that's a difference between the youthful, zealous strains of political action where they want to fight everyone and show no quarter with the older more tempered strains where you understand that treating your enemies with dignity and respect, where it is due, and giving them the same "rights" in a fair fight is the winning move for any number of reasons, not the least of which you don't waste effort fighting ghosts. In the KKK case, as I've said in the WBC case, you're best bet is to just let them say what they wanna say, the KKK is going to have to give a good case for racism in the public square and if you're confident your side is right you have nothing to fear from their argument. It is easily countered. Same with the WBC, I think it's absolutely horrid they went out being cunts at funerals, and well, if we are going to make a very specific law, for this very specific problem, that applies to everyone, like "you can freely protest funerals anywhere except for within 500 meters of the funeral itself" or something I could get behind that, but again, the best option is to ignore these cunts and horrid as their behavior can be, especially if you were on the pro-lgbt side the WBC is basically winning the argument for you anyway since they are alienating the general public.

    I think we are seeing another political shift. As we always do really. We have always been at war with Eurasia after all. The Republican party was a radical anti-slavery party, the democrats were absolutely the party of the racists, until is switched. Indeed it switched again? It's hard to say exactly where these switches occur. But they seem to change generation from generation. The Dems are the pro-corporate establishment party. The GOP the pro-corporate anti-established establishment party. Until the next election of course. Then they're going to be the pro status quo party while the other party is the anti status quo party? Filter in some new flavor of the month cultural war issues and you'll have your fun. St. Patriarchy Day is Elf-phobic anyone? Perhaps we get at the true evil in our society. Toilet paper and how it kills the trees! I am the Lorax I speak for the trees because the trees can't speak for themselves. No trees shall be cut down before the third-trimester!

    Before I have a psychotic break thinking about the poor poor plight of the Elf-phobic trees and the rampant discrimination of them and the arborphiles by the flora-sexual-phobes. I must remind you that we have always been at war with Eastasia!

    [–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Will add that I think the association of the religious people with the "conservatives" is a relatively recent phenomenon. I think the religious "conservative" moral panic types are a lot closer to progressive liberal ideals than conservative positions. I mean if you think about it they are anti-alcohol, anti-drug, anti-gambling, etc, all these anti-vice positions were a big part of progressive movements and were and are largely driven by women, partly because women have more empathy and see the legitimate problems all these vices cause, but also partially because on some level they don't want to compete with men's attention with various vices. In the past these women tended to be highly religious because well, the church was the primary social institution and that's where women did their socializing. (It's not like they were the ones going to the saloon.)

    Now I think it's changed and the internet has become the primary socialization hub. I think you'll see that with the mass adoption of cellphones, there's a huge increase in women using it along with the rise in social media.

    Again somewhat anecdotal but when I first got on Facebook made tons of friends with women (hell yeah why not) and noticed that in general they tended to post a lot more often and a lot of the, what I'd call non-humorous memes, political populist points, etc. Even if it was still at a point where I largely agreed with them I thought it was rather a waste of time.

    [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's because what we've been calling "conservatives" were never really conservatives at all; rather the communist left labeled libertarians conservatives as it sought to destroy them both.

    This triggered fusionism, so the conservatives kind of went into hiding behind the libertarians. "Regain the freedom to say what we want first, and then we can worry about taking over." Now for some reason they've taken the mask off again even though they haven't been able to do that. I suspect they largely forgot their plan after fusionism took full effect, but now the recent unrest has led the new generation to rediscover the old truly conservative ideology.

    [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Conservatives don't like free speech anymore either. Get up to date, we are the absolute scum of society.

    [–]1Icemonkey 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

    Phooey. We don’t even have a s/niggers.

    [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    We did but it got banned

    [–]1Icemonkey 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Seriously? This is before my time here obviously. What exactly happened?

    [–]Airbus320 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Magnora chimped out

    [–]1Icemonkey 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    The obvious thing to do was to immediately create s/coontown, just as we did on Reddit back in the day.

    Oh well.

    [–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

    It’s where censored people go.

    This is THE LAST PLACE you can say nigger. On earth.

    [–]Evola 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    No it isn't.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Well I guess 4chan? Can you say that word on 4 Chan.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    [–]WoodyWoodPecker 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Registration is temporarily closed.

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    tell us you don't use rdrama.net but use different words

    [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Was rdrama's or Ruqqus's Discord server banned about a year ago? Curious because all the Ruqqus Discord people randomly disappeared at the same time, which is what happens when Discord bans a server. I know they have a significant overlap with rdrama too.

    [–]EternalSunset 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    That site is owned by a pro censorship literal tranny who also happens to be responsible for destroying ruqqus.

    [–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I suppose you mean carpathianflorist. He isn't really a tranny or probably anything he claims to be. He just says things to stir the pot.

    Do you happen to know if Ruqqus's Discord was banned about a year ago? In my own final months I noticed that all the people still with that dump randomly disappeared, which indicates that Discord banned one of their servers.

    [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    what can be destroyed by carp, should be

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    I don’t get the joke.

    [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    you can say nigger there LMAO

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Hahaha.

    Can you? I think I would get banned. I understand it’s basically all tranny stuff

    [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    you understand nothing

    go there and give yourself greater understanding as well as brain cancer

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I don’t care to have brain cancer.

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    then take my word for it you can say almost anything there

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I will. Keep it in mind if said it closes.

    [–]passionflounder 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The "ir-" got lopped off the site name.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Tranny and they/them copes a mile long in that article.

    [–]Drewski 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Imagine /r/atheism, r/im14andthisisdeep and somethingawful.com decided to make an pretentious wikipedia and you've got "rational" wiki.

    [–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    They really ripped into The Amazing Atheist when he went through his Libertarian phase.

    [–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    That whole page is on subs that are barely relevant

    [–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Wait a minute. The creator and primary editor of that page is "Edward the eight".

    [–]EternalSunset 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    "irRationalWiki is an online collaborative space full of so called "content" filled with things like supposed words and rational images which are meant to trick readers into believing whatever information their editors want to sell. It's really just a lot of elitist point-of-view and high bias. Their supposed substance of the wiki is mostly copied off of Wikipedia[1] seasoned with a dash of original insight, a touch of snark and a massive dollop of American Liberal bias, Bernie Sanders born again religion, and Soylent Starbucks FAPpuChino addiction. A majority of the user-base on RationalWiki are established mentally ill obese neckbeard SJW thinkers whose liberal interpretation of everything including the wiki's rules allows them to say whatever the heck they want, permit visiting trolls to graffiti the shit out of the wiki and basically ban and promote whoever they wish, only sometimes based on their democratic voting process. While the wiki has five thousand registered editors it is likely that they are all sock-puppets of one single editor, so bored out of their mind that they play the role of editors, antagonists, admins, Tumblr SJWs, DeviantArt autists, vandals and you name it based on a multiple-personality complex that somewhere got completely out of hand." - Uncyclopedia's entry on RationalWiki

    [–]8thmonitor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    lol

    [–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    One contributor said that how the plandemic ties in with the rise of the left, Jewish supremacism, totalitarianism, and the new space race. First he explains that the Jew are supremacist and that they are using the Covid-19 pandemic to establish totalitarian communism, he then states that we are in an extinction level event within 20, 25 year maximum he says that we are 12,800 years into the 12,000 year cycle he then cites the pseudoscience promoting YouTube Channel Suspicious0bservers, He then says that a few rich people know about the extinction level event He states that this is why they are building bases to Mars. He then says that a monster from Medina, Washington is trying to approach this through Earth earth modification techniques he then says the monster is Jewish. At the end he says that when the third temple is built in Jerusalem, and the Jews reign supreme and control the world, a Messiah will show up and save the Jews.

    You're featured, /u/Alphix!

    These people are good at ridiculing people by picking out the most absurd sounding statements to turn people away from a source. If you scroll down, you can see that they support medical experimentation and deny the dangers of (non-)vaccines. All of their articles are hit pieces and gatekeeping is in fact their only purpose. They slap the label rationality on it, thereby giving it a bad name. I wonder who funds them.

    Anyway, the article is good for entertainment purposes, I did get a laugh out of it.

    [–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Wow! I am noticed! I must be right about SOMETHING... :D

    See? I TOLD YOU SO.

    Anyway, a monster from Medina, Washington? Whut? Who lives there? I didn't even know the name of that place before reading this!

    EDIT: I found a list of notable people who live there. Might I have been talking about one of these?

    • Jeff Bezos, founder and executive chairman of Amazon.[33]
    • Jeffrey Brotman, attorney, businessman and the co-founder of Costco Wholesale Corporation[34]
    • Jeff Cirillo, former MLB third baseman, currently MLB Scout with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
    • Norton Clapp, former chairman of Weyerhaeuser[35]
    • Bill Gates, co-founder and former chairman of Microsoft, philanthropist[8]
    • Melinda Gates, Ex-wife of the co-founder of Microsoft and philanthropist[8]
    • Gerald Grinstein, former CEO of Delta Air Lines[36]
    • Nathan Myhrvold, formerly Chief Technology Officer at Microsoft, is co-founder of Intellectual Ventures and the principal author of Modernist Cuisine
    • Wayne M. Perry, former president McCaw Cellular, Vice-Chairman of AT&T Wireless Services, founder Edge Wireless, former National President of the Boy Scouts of America[37]
    • Mark Pigott, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Paccar[38]
    • William Ruckelshaus, former Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, former Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and former United States Deputy Attorney General[39][36]
    • MacKenzie Scott, author and philanthropist
    • Jon Shirley, former Microsoft president and noted art collector[40]
    • Jack Sikma, Hall of Fame NBA center for the Seattle SuperSonics[41]
    • Charles Simonyi, former Microsoft executive[42]

    Oh, and one more thing: I never wrote that the Jewish messiah would appear and save the Jews. I wrote that THE JEWS believe this. Obviously if a messiah appears it will be to save MANKIND from the Jews.

    [–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    "One contributor posted an article from The Organic Prepper - a NaturalNews like survivalist webshite[28] The person who made the article on The Organic Prepper then goes on to say seven of the following things were conspiracy theories until 2020[29]:

    Universal Basic Income Travel Papers Mandatory GPS tracking of humans Cashless societies Microchips Mandatory vaccines Re-education camps"

    Lol what.

    "Universal Basic Income"

    This isn't a conspiracy theory it's been discussed by actual presidential candidates. (It already exists in a limited state see social welfare)

    Travel Papers

    Cough "passports" cough.

    You know it wasn't that long ago where you could just travel without one many places? I mean longer than an average human lifetime sure but humans don't live very long. Like 80 years or so and you guys just die. Pathetic, even trees live longer than you. And trees are one of the most pathetic forms of life I've ever seen. They can't even move.

    "Mandatory GPS tracking of humans"

    Mandatory? Voluntary. Humans jump at the chance to be tracked. They carry their tracking devices with them everywhere and anxiously wait in long queues to buy the latest and greatest tracking device.

    "Cashless societies"

    Not really a conspiracy. More like a policy. They want to push away from cash ostensibly because it makes it harder to crime. That's true enough. The problems with that are well documented see "why is my card declined?"

    Also any truly shit cashless society would see a quick currency collapse. Even if it's bit coins in the ether still subject to market forces like it or not.

    "Microchips"

    Microchips exist everywhere. They're in your tracking devices you want to buy.

    Mandatory vaccines

    Lol. It's totally not mandatory. You just can't participate in society without one. Freedom!

    Re-education camps

    I think this is called sensitivity training. Or it was before.

    [–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't think anyone ever uses the term far-right when it's appropriate anymore...it's just another empty insult that preschoolers-level people use.

    [–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

    [–]Fiyanggu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Nobody cares what fucking retarded leftists think.