you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

Okay socks, who was banned for good reason.

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

    Says the alt-user-account of socks who was banned.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (7 children)

    Thou shalt not take Lord Tucker's name in vain

    [–]dipshit 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    Thou shalt torture Carlson to death, slowly, if I remember correctly. Many Saiditors have wanted socks to die a horrible death, but they weren't banned. Moreover, the US would be a much better place if Carlson croaked, ending the most popular misinformation propaganda resource for the 1% forces of evil of the past two decades.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

    socks will die of hyper-partisanship soon enough

    [–]dipshit 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

    Socks asks only for an appreciation of the center, of mediocrity, of non-radicalized representative politics for the 99%, so says my man Salieri

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    Responding with three different user names in a thread is a bit fucked, socks.

    [–]dipshit 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

    2, dingleberry, not 3

    Think of it this way: everytime someone is banned, they splt into 2 users, then 4, then 8, then 16, and so on

    I'm currently at two, awaiting the next ban

    [–]Zapped 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Every time a user is banned, a hand gets its sock.