There's a misunderstanding here, I think.

So we're all crazy so that's why we believe "propaganda."...

I refer to different points of view

Jason would be authoritarian liberal in the political compass, not right at all.

I note that - regardless of what you or think he is - he is supporting right-wing propaganda

It's all propaganda one way or another

I am referring to the right-wing, authoritarian propaganda. Left wing approaches favor democracies and right-wing approaches favor authoritarianism. There is no "authoritarian liberal" concept in statecraft that is anti-democratic.

the right doesn't have a monopoly.

It has indeed - controlling the Senate for many years, and in some cases, controlling the house. That's a legislative monopoly.

The people who say these are artificial divisions meant to keep us from dealing with real issues may be onto something.

They are facts, not artificial divisions.

Look at the left bullshit news, look at the right bullshit news, look at foreign bullshit news with their own foreign agenda (Agent Socks), and the truth is probably in the middle somewhere.

Yes, though this oversimplifies the problems

Maybe, but that would destroy the whole reason you're here. There's one Muskrat to ~122 users here on an average day, ~177 on a good day. If you add 100,000 users, you do not get some percentage of extra Muskrats. You have one Muskrat out if 100,122 users now. A diluted value.

No - Saidit would be more interesting and engaging if it had more users. Currently, there is not much value to dilute.

And it's not just me, but all the unique voices here. We don't get bolstered by adding people, we get drowned out and/or end up banned by the new masses joining, electronic gentrification.

Interesting point and term, but look at the users who run the place. 'Electronic/social gentrification' would result from them leaving, which is doubtful. By contrast - anyone who disagrees with right-wing propaganda on Saidit is abused and eventually leaves (I can remind you of the usernames).