all 37 comments

[–]Canbot 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

I think just about everyone here has experienced socks bullshit and knows he is a professional propagandists. Always "misinterpreting" everything. Always making disingenuous arguments. Uses every trick in the book.

It is never about having a conversation, or speaking your mind with socks. He also clearly has several alts. Claiming that not allowing him to destroy this site with his bullshit is anti free speech is really on character.

[–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

> Always "misinterpreting" everything.

Indeed. There is little to no authentic discussion nor open-minded debate from bad faith users /u/usehername, /u/socks, and /u/ShalomEveryone with their selectively argumentative comments and masturbatory circular logic that goad the gullible into endless pointless timesucks. Read this comment section for examples of these long-con sealion asstrolls.

I've had conflicts with /u/HibikiBlack, /u/Horrux, and others, but I've not called for them to be banned, because despite their different views it's apparent that they are at least trying to understand, usually. If my mission really was to suppress free speech on SaidIt, I would have declared them to be on my Bad Faith Ban Wish List, along with some retarded racists and Nazis in /s/DebateAltRight, along with other authoritarians and extremists. You won't see me call for that.

[–]grassfed 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

u/magnora7 maybe left saidit again

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Haven't gone anywhere... not sure why you're spreading rumors

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm I wonder why?

[–]JasonCarswell 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

That chat snapshot is not the gotcha you think it is.

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I wasn't going to post it but you were being annoying with your "phew there's only 8 witnesses" shit

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

I wasn't going to post it but you were being annoying with your "phew there's only 8 witnesses" shit

Go fuck yourself liar.

As usual you misinterpret everything.

It literally said, 19:08 @JasonCarswell:
When they ask for it the plausible deniability is provided.
At present there are only 8 witnesses anyway.

At that point there were only 8 people in #subscribed. I wanted MORE to witness your bullshit.

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At that point there were only 8 people in #subscribed. I wanted MORE to witness your bullshit.

Then why were you so grateful you had plausible deniability for the inevitable "authoritarian" accusations?

[–]HibikiBlack 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jason does has a point when saying Saidit isn't completely free speech and while I agree using force should be avoided, the air in that chat was rather toxic. Not saying what he did was right either but people can lose their shit. Besides, socks has probably had conflicts with nearly everybody over here. I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of the alts of Phoenix. Our old rival from way back in r/conspiracy who is responsible for banning many conspiracists by using dozens of alts. Socks is just the most obvious one but I fight him over here on a regular basis.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

    Okay, asstroll, fEd.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

    Carswell and a few others have a long history of wanting to ban free speech on Saidit. Whenever they've tried to get some users banned (from the site, subs and/or chat), they've faced resistence from other Saiditors who've noted that Saidit is supposed to be a free speech website. It's been good to see Saiditors who literally hate me arguing that it's nonetheless wrong to ban me. I've found that interesting. That said, if those same users bother to read this comment here, they'll perhaps now say mean things to me. In any event - it's a good point here about free speech, and I think a conversation Saiditors should have periodically, because a number of them seem to disagree, and because a resolution to this problem will potentially help Saidit grow and be more interesting. Attempts to limit speech at Saidit tend to kill the activity here.

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

    Ah, yes. Socks sounding all reasonable now that he gets to play the victim. Very Jewish of you, socks.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    WTF you talking about Horrux? No one here is a victim.

    [–]jet199 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

    It's been good to see Saiditors who literally hate me arguing that it's nonetheless wrong to ban me. I've found that interesting.

    Very telling, like you're observing another species.

    If this was reddit or some other majority woke site, you wouldn't be doing the same for liberals and conservatives there. It wouldn't even cross your mind to argue against banning in that mix.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Very funny

    Reddit's species are also observed by all of us....

    [–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

    " Waaaaaaaah! I can't chat for 12 hours! "

    Where are your sources? Please spend at least 12 hours or more doing research to cite the information that I'll just ignore when presented, as you do.

    If you want SaidIt to grow and be more interesting then YOU need to grow and be more interesting, or leave.

    SaidIt has never been a "free speech" site where people can just say what ever bullshit they want. It's about free-thinking and truth-seeking and you do neither.

    So go fuck yourself authoritarian shill liar sealion - or better: Just leave SaidIt.

    [–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    SaidIt has never been a "free speech" site

    Interesting. Then maybe you should remove the lines claiming it is from the Infogalactic wiki page you contributed to.

    https://infogalactic.com/info/SaidIt

    [–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

    Read further asstroll. I haven't properly updated much less finished that article in years. Or better, ask M7 and D3 what their views on the matter. They disliked the "free speech" in that old article and said so many times since. Dig that up on SaidIt if you want to timesuck. SaidIt is NOT Voat, Poal, nor Ruqqus, so go fuck yourself.

    If you continue to try to antagonize me I'll just ban you every chance I get and declare you an authoritarian enemy of free-thinking and truth-seeking, just as I have with others. I doubt you really want that.

    [–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    If you continue to try to antagonize me I'll just ban you every chance I get and declare you an authoritarian enemy of free-thinking and truth-seeking, just as I have with others. I doubt you really want that.

    Please you are so pathetic. Don't be a cancer to the site, Jason. And do you see your logical contradictions?:

    I'll just ban you every chance I get

    [I'll] declare you an authoritarian

    Please do not humiliate yourself further. Look up some nice pastry recipes.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The usual ad hominims a retarded narcissist would make. You love posts like this. Ask yourself why you've accomplished nothing important in your life.

    [–]ShalomEveryone 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Carswell and a few others have a long history of wanting to ban free speech on Saidit.

    You got that right! They only believe in free speech they agree with. If you voice a differing opinion too often and stand firm in your beliefs it's only a matter of time before he cries and calls for your banishment because you're a "shill" and "sealioning".

    Shalom

    ✡️

    [–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

    Your voice is as authentic and valid as the other authoritarian liar shill sealions here.

    [–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

    When Jason says you're not valid 😔😔😔

    [–]grassfed 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Trannys are not valid

    [–]AcceleratedWallops 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    • Saiditors complaining that reddit is censoring them and creating a leftist safe space and echo chamber

    • Saiditors complaining that Saidit isn't a rightard safe space and echo chamber

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      why?

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Why do you think he's an AI?

        [–]grassfed 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Because its a cuck

        [–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Freedom of the press, as they say, is limited to those who own one.

        [–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

        Thanks for the message, authoritarian zombie.

        [–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

        Openly does not believe in free speech but I'm the authoritarian zombie.

        [–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

        Mind if I shit on your dinner table and call it free speech?

        [–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

        Mind if I shit on yours and call it a protest?

        [–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

        You can try and I'll block your road into next week.

        [–]usehername[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Acting macho because I refuted your point. Logic was not sound and acting macho did not work :( try again.