you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]discountmeat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Saidit is not uncensorable, it just has a policy that is leaps and bounds above others. It has a policy about being transparent when removing users. Policy doesn't make it truly uncensorable. If you want truly unscensorable, post your work on the blockchain. That's impossible to censor as long as the internet is live.

    I'm all for tearing down the internet as we know it and separate those who can handle different opinions and those who needs safe spaces!

    Not following. Different opinions are impossible to avoid, and that's not what I am proposing. I am proposing Saidit elevate the privelidges required to participate in a public conversation. People tend to get childish and mean when they have anonymity online. That's what I would like to separate out. See my comments on kokolokoNightcrawler's comment to get a better understanding.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]discountmeat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      If you were moderating a community I wanted to join, I couldn't since I don't meet your standards. That's just fine. I can find one that is a good fit or conform to your standards if I really want to contribute.

      The recent blacklisting feature is neat and may be enough to fix the problem. Shared blacklists would add even more power.

      It's takes a certain type of person to post an idea and KNOW it will have to be barraged. The whitelist (or shared blacklist) will empower a wider range of contributors by preventing the attack in the first place.