all 3 comments

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

despite finding that Officer Eulizier violated numerous departmental policies

As ABC reported, Crump pointed out Eulizier’s history and called him a “ticking time bomb” for problems he’s had at another department.

In fact, TFTP reported on a case out of Texas in which a police officer was indicted for doing this very thing.

This can't be accidental. If the police doesn't want to murder citizens, why do they keep rehiring murderers from other departments and allow them to ignore the rules?

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Suspect was literally executing a vehicular escape attempt. Good shoot.

As a self-admitted former operative of the NSA, I would bet money that Matt Agorist is now working for 'some agency' to stir up as much unrest among the population as he can. Dunno for who, or why, but he's been running this "criminals good, cops bad" shtick for quite some time.

[–]Drewski[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Subduing a fleeing criminal is not worth taking someones life, that's not reasonable force. Matt does tend to get a bit hyperbolic with some of his language, but I don't think he usually defends the suspect, just states that they don't deserve to be executed on the spot as is so often the case.