all 3 comments

[–]Drewski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I'm no good at math or statistics but I think you'd have to compare the vulnerable groups and those with comorbidities rather than the general population. So like kids and young people have basically no risk, and many are unvaccinated, so you'd remove them. Then compare, say, adults over 70 who are unvaccinated vs unvaccinated, and separate them further by comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, etc.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Statistics can hide all kinds of stuff. Per case we can see what the real cause is..
It also needs to be separated in things like age-group and health-status.
There are now some methods to determine if the vax caused heart problems or if it caused auto-immunity.
But these tests are rarely done.

I believe it is far far worse.
The "unvaccinated" deaths are often "just vaccinated", due to registering them only after 2 weeks.
All these deaths could easily have been prevented with early treatment.

Unless they are stopped, they will just go on with the mantra "safe and effective", until everyone is dead.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)