you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

Or are you saying women use more of the support than they pay into?

Yes, exactly. Women pay 50 dollars but get 55 dollars. (example only)

[–]Amongstclouds 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

xactly. Women pay 50 dollars but get 55 dollars. (example only)

Could it be because they are paid less and thus have less to tax?

[–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

Yes, they work less and are more on public support

[–]Amongstclouds 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

So, do they work less because they have to take care of the children?

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

Barsel is shared 50:50 by men and women. We have institutions for the children.

They work less because they are privileged

[–]Amongstclouds 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

It seems like you should work harder on working less rather than bitching that someone else is working less. You failed at the system, yo.

[–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

The system is systemically sexist, so even if I "succeeded" at the system by working less and being a parasite on society (like women), then it wouldn't change the systemically sexist society.

You're demonstrating the feminist logic though, so congrats on that one.

[–]Amongstclouds 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

No, I was just being a shit because I think your rhetoric is stale. You're clearly proving that there is a wage gap and that the system is correcting for it. But you're calling it laziness instead. And it's just soooo boring so I'm being a turd to you becase it is funny. Sorry for taking cheap shots but seriously, you're misinterpreting data soooo hard it's just...like, are you okay?

[–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

No, you're just being rude. I am a man so I am used to that kind of behaviour. It wasn't a good insult either because your logic was obviously flawed, like most feminists, which is why I pointed it out, so you looked like the idiot that your logic painted you as.

You're forgiven. Its female nature, so who can really blame you?

Its not laziness. Its privilege.
They don't have to work, they get everything from the state,which the state steals from the men who are forced to work.

I'm not misinterpreting data. You just don't like the data because of my angle.
Do you think you're coming with some new novel feminist idea? Feminists have been lying about this for years and you repeating the lie with faulty logic and insults doesn't make the lies true, even if you feel like you want it to be true.
I know you're used to just getting everything that you feel like you want, but hey, welcome to mgtow. We don't give a shit about women, so don't expect to get a better treatment than men get.
Don't worry, I wont insult you or be rude to you in the way that you were towards me. Unlike you, I'm a man and we have a code of honor.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I don't understand. I remembered a comment you made about a month ago about women (and because I inconveniently only remembershit that has no actual need), and it surprised me. Through the time I had spent on saidit-- you generally shared comments similar to the on that I'm replying to right now. And then there was this:

Women aren't the problem. Jews are the problem. Women are frankly amazing human beings and much of what we do is because we love them so much.

They are a product of the jewish society that they live in. Change the environment and the behaviour of women (and men) will change with it.

Women bad is jewish propaganda.

So which is it then? Because I appreciate excellent and even low effort shitposting, but this is just flippant.

[–]Amongstclouds 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Keep telling yourself that, dude.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This comment was reported with reason

he's just such a loser

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Its female nature

It's not female nature, it's female privilege.

Don't worry, I wont insult you or be rude to you in the way that you were towards me. Unlike you, I'm a man and we have a code of honor.

You are being kind of rude but it's almost impossible to have an argument otherwise.

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

If that's true they should offer this support to people who work less, not all women. It's just another excuse for women to have everything handed to them.

It's not going to encourage women working either.

[–]Amongstclouds 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

If that's true they should offer this support to people who work less, not all women. It's just another excuse for women to have everything handed to them.

Wait, if it's true that they work less because they are caring for the children then they should pay people who aren't caring for children to work less because...why?? I'm sooo confused.

[–]Vulptex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

And they shouldn't pay men who are caring for children because...why??

Like I said it's an excuse for why they're helping women more than men.

[–]Amongstclouds 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

they shouldn't pay men who are caring for children because...why??

Like I said it's an excuse for why they're helping women more than men.

Who said they aren't? Most societies still place most of the child-rearing burden upon women. Which is why I ASKED if that was why. It's possible it's slightly different where they are. You are making a lot of fucking assumptions and you're weirdly obsessed with me - like, go continue our argument or whatever.

[–]Vulptex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Women who aren't raising children should not get the benefits. Men who are raising children should. That's the problem.

[–]Amongstclouds 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

That's not what they said. None of the convo was saying that. You're making shit up.