use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
reddit mods these days
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from i.imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (11 children)
Reddit is NOT progressive.
Reddit is SJW/BLM corporate Dems (GOP in Dems clothing). VERY different.
As different as GOP and AltRight. Or GOP and AnCap.
[–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (10 children)
SJW/BLM corporate Dems
I've never heard anyone try to separate this from the term progressive.
Maybe liberal. I'll still occasionally point out that the left are no longer the liberal side in the US. But I've never heard someone try to distinguish progressive from this, particularly the SJW and BLM parts.
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (9 children)
Now you have. It's NOT uncommon. If you knew anything about the left you'd know there's a HUGE rift in it too.
Just as the alt-right has been unfairly demonized and many of their stances have been twisted and spun into nonsense (ie. all Nazis, all racists, all supremacists, all sexists, etc) in an organize media psyop, so too the progressive left has been much maligned by being associated with the SJW/BLM corporate Dem bullshit. All the fake progressives in the Dems are posers who might say SOME of the things actual progressives believe in, but they never act.
Real progressives:
Many of these overlap with the alt-right, an-cap, and voluntarists. None of them are in the Overton window.
BLM, SJW, trans agenda, and the climate change scam are fake distraction issues. Sure some progressives may buy into these, maybe even all these distractions, but MANY do not. Those who call them out won't ever have MSM voices.
Just as they made "conspiracy theorist" and "truther" into pejorative terms, they are twisting "progressive" so much now that many who say they haven't changed but the definition has, are at a loss for a clear label for what they stand for. Even just this past week Kim Iversen went on yet another big rant about it. I don't recall if it was one I posted or if I was too busy and just listened.
See also: /s/Progressivism /s/IronLeft
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (8 children)
[deleted]
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (6 children)
Then as now, no group of people is immune from having many ruling class tricks they regret. More often than not there's only the lesser of evils and/or no opting out. I don't want to be a subject of the Queen, nor under mafia government rule, nor pay taxes, nor have a bank account that steals $11 a month I can't afford...
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (2 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
Not just a phone on a line, but more and more you need a smart phone to verify your existence. I was an early adopter 2003-2010 and cut free. I've managed thus far, but may have to get one to live in the new normal.
I'm sure there were some progressives that overlapped with conspirophiles, but I wouldn't conflate them. Heck, Jimmy Dore and Kim Iversen can't even fully embrace the idea that it's all rigged (an obvious conspiracy).
I don't think the old way was to be racist, so much as less globalist and more nationalist. Further, the old progressives knew to be anti-war and anti-oppression - and stopping those problems would stop forcing people from their homes and lands to seeking better lives.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
I beleive /u/diogenesjunior was banned by M7. I thought he was one of the good ones, like you, among my /s/friends. M7 has had several meltdowns previously, and from what I see here it's on par. I'm preparing something that might inspire folks like you to ask questions so that we can ask for M7's justification about it. DioJr hasn't been fully clear about his role, but if innocent, IMO there would be more than enough reason at least have a serious discussion or few about it. A few others are aware, but I haven't started wrangling up a protest movement yet. I need to be more sure long before it comes to that.
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
So like Lindbergh?
view the rest of the comments →
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (11 children)
[–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (10 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (9 children)
[–][deleted] (8 children)
[deleted]
[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (6 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)