you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Nothing you have just said is relevant to that individuals account of events. Starting with your lack of an ability to discern my statement 'sex party' to yours "gay sex party", and culminating on your pointless knowledge of Isaac Newton's sex life.

If you wish to know more on this topic. Just ask Taylor Swift.

Ask her a̯̪̱̝̙̭̰ͬͪ̇͑̋ͪ̑bout Rome. Specifically.

[–]AsInBeer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You just hate gays it appears. So that's where we part ways.

Also, very famous fact about Newton. You just weren't previously aware of it is all.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"You just hate gays it appears."

Right. Let me clear this up for you. I broke down the events to there objective core elements, and pointed out the relevant factors. Where as you allowed yourself to become lost in the minutiae of the event, which led you to write a long string of drivel. And now you are outright slandering me, because of your prejudiced mindset, where you think or feel you can make assumptions about those who you take ill with.

"Also, very famous fact about Newton. You just weren't previously aware of it is all."

Here we have a prime example of your inability to express yourself. For some reason you think a random thought that crossed your mind was relevant, and in no way needed to be parsed or introduced into the topᴉc. And now you are patting yourself on the back for 'knowing something'. Be it something that was irrelevant, and you were incapable of interjecting into the conversation properly. But whatever. Good Job!

" So that's where we part ways ̙͙͙̈́ͨ̐"

No, I'm afraid it isn't. You're presumption that I hate gays, will forever mark you as the incompetent bigot that you are. I'll be keeping an eye out for more low level, low effort nonsense from the beer aficionado.

Ĥ̅͛ǝ̮̺͕̲̰llo ʍoɹlp' I,m Qnǝsʇᴉouɐqlǝ.̬̘̟ͅ

[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right. Let me clear this up for you. I broke down the events to there objective core elements, and pointed out the relevant factors. Where as you allowed yourself to become lost in the minutiae of the event, which led you to write a long string of drivel. And now you are outright slandering me, because of your prejudiced mindset, where you think or feel you can make assumptions about those who you take ill with.

It's enough to say I (AsInBeer) am wrong. I take correction easily. Many people disagree with your "drivel" characterization. Nothing I did was slander.

Here we have a prime example of your inability to express yourself. For some reason you think a random thought that crossed your mind was relevant, and in no way needed to be parsed or introduced into the topᴉc. And now you are patting yourself on the back for 'knowing something'. Be it something that was irrelevant, and you were incapable of interjecting into the conversation properly. But whatever. Good Job!

It wasn't random, it was a germane example of someone who lived a great life but never found sexual happiness.

..will forever mark you...

Horrors.