you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (44 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    People don’t realise how pedo queer theory is

    Edit: and i think it’s illogical to break all boundaries. Why anyone would imagine that as a good thing is mystifying to me. It’s like the child who keeps doing something wrong because you told them not to. Very immature basis for theory

    Editx2: they created new, queer norms, but did nothing to better society, in the end.

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

      It seriously seems like something rich eccentrics came up with at the turn of the last century. You have to have power to play with it, meanwhile, many in the world don’t even have food or medicines to treat curable disease. It’s the “let them eat cake” of theory

      EDIT: if they want to play with power they should just join some bdsm club. Lol

      [–]Innisfree 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Oh they sure did. Incidentally, the queer theory proponents your Foucaults and Wittigs come from very Conservative Catholic families. I wonder if theres' a link / s :D

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Yeah and also a link between trans and conservative catholic families. Lots of kids from backgrounds like that end up needing to repair their own brains for years to come

      [–]Innisfree 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Shall we start an NGO for the poor things? BrainRepair.org We'll show them David Attenborough docs, for a small fee of course that will go towards reissuing The Lavender Menice manifesto lol

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      That’s a good start! Lol

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Also: the whole “happy hooker” thing is a perfect example of who gets fucked over from things like queer theory. WOMEN

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Yeah. I have known hookers, that happy hooker shit is straight up cam girl nonsense. I bet you’re happy when no one is touching you, dumbass. Even then it would be disgusting, but i honestly doubt there are many women working the street or escorting that are “happy hookers.”

        [–]Innisfree 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

        Really appreciate your insightful reply!

        Particularly because my angry order of some books by Foucault will take time to arrive. I think Helen Pluckrose also mentioned Foucault's influences in her tracing of the history of queer theory and gives a summary in her talk here .

        I'm dying to know who was it Butler was so miffed with - probably radfems glorifying the female goddesses Lol

        So far I found Butler's ideas, specifically on abolishing the categories of sex, clearly articulated in Wittig's writing. This article explains the connection and summarises Wittig's writings. It also makes fun of Butler misunderstanding and misusing her sources. For that alone a great read, for those who have time for a bit of schadenfreude.

        Ps: I'm sure you're well informed on the whole schtick, I just included the links for those who might be entertained by digging around a bit.

        [–][deleted]  (28 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Innisfree 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Brilliant you are!

          because women are individuals who have different experiences (across stuff like race and class), it is therefore impossible for women to have ANYTHING in common EVER,

          Butler - the queen of false premises and overgeneralizations.

          Loooool about the bow ties. Spot on!

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

          Well, at least we will be served our dinner more quickly at the banquet if more women are servers. Lol. Don’t think it will destroy the whole womanhood thing, but you never know.

          [–][deleted]  (24 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (23 children)

            Judith Butler should have found a million pairs of legs to bury her head between instead of writing a bunch of dumb dumb stuff and being the spokesperson for this ridiculous time we have found ourselves in. I’m sure she could have found some commonalities between women by becoming an expert at head. Maybe I’ll pitch this idea to her

            [–][deleted]  (22 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

              She would go for it, I think. I am very persuasive!

              [–][deleted]  (20 children)

              [deleted]

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

                Yeah, I’d hit it. For the sake of women.

                Edit: Project: OCCUPY BUTLER

                [–]carrotcake 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                It saddens me that so many people in academia are ok with this Foucault idea that individual resistance is the way to go.

                [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                [deleted]

                  [–]carrotcake 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  Exactly