Chit-ChatSunday Social - open chat!

submitted by [deleted] from (self.LGBDropTheT)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think we need to have a theoretical foundation, just rolling our eyes up at the latest excess isn't going to be enough.

I'm in complete agreement; the transologists have the power, so we've gotta have the brains. Particularly because this is their weakness. The argument for transgenderism (such as it is) rests entirely on emotion: misplaced compassion, prejudice (sexism, homophobia, biphobia), narcissism, and fear. It can't withstand rationality. To take it down, our position needs to be well thought-out, lucid, and solid... in short, everything that theirs is not.

Which doesn't mean that there's no room for snarking when genderism shows its ass! We need to keep morale up, after all. Just as long as we don't lose sight of our long-term goal.

Glad to meet a fellow theoretician, Sir! Welcome to La Resistance :)

[–]GayPartisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Snarking is fine. However, for some, that is all they do as their full program. I also plan not to get pulled into sexological and gender debates in terms of the theories. The whole history is that they constantly shift and are often wholesale overthrown. What I am looking at is how are they enabled to be in power, to have power. It comes out of the modern neoliberal university and their gender studies departments. What are the reasons is it supported so widely, why are we in a position of being a fighting minority. Argue about the gender identity theories if you want, I think that is probably important. I want to understand why we are arguing at all, when Gay men make up most of the LGBTQXYZ, and are the financial basis of the Pride Parades and the custmers of the ads that fund the Alphabet Soup press.