Targeting / HarassmentSunday Times: "Trans activism is on the retreat. Let’s hope Professor Stock is these bullies’ last victim"

submitted by wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]7874 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Honestly, people have been saying "transactivism is on the retreat" since back when I used to lurk the old reddit subs and yet... it's bigger than ever.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Have you seen the news in the last three weeks from the UK? Much of it is noted on our sub here.

[–]7874 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It is positive news, but I'm just wary. I thought we were set with the Kiera Bell case, but it was overturned.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Agreed, there is no sense in attaching to hope, because that's just a set-up for disappointment. Instead, just keep working. That is the only thing that will help, after all.

[–]7874 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm worried about "transtrenderism"/AGP being denounced, but HSTS being kept as "real transsexuals" and the horrific "transition" of homosexuals and GNC people suspected to be homosexual being continued and celebrated.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

but HSTS being kept as "real transsexuals"

Not sure I'm following. What's your worry about with that group? If they aren't harassing anyone or trying to get laws changed or created in ways that compromise other people's rights I don't see an issue.

[–]7874 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Homosexual transsexualism is insanely homophobic.

It's evil to surgically "alter" (the word I want to use is banned) homosexuals, removing their testicles and turning their penises inside out and not allowing them to heal, which makes them very prone to infection, or removing their breasts and arm skin and sewing up their vaginas, and altering their bodies permanently with hormones. These procedures shorten their lives and worsen the quality of their lives, all because society/their family/the person themselves isn't comfortable with a GNC homosexual person just existing as they are. The practice should be banned and any doctor who has ever participated in it should rot in jail for eternity.

Also, they do have their own laws in effect such as the right to forge documents, for example putting the wrong sex marker on their driver's license. This is a homophobic lie and is dangerous for the person's health. If a HSTS gets in a massive car accident and is unconscious and needs medication, the doctors will give them the dose that corresponds to the sex marker on their driver's license. I know someone who almost died like that.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm referring, obviously (btw, please make fewer assumptions about where people are coming from, here; remember, you are still new and know a lot less about the people of this sub than you seem to assume you do, or their knowledge or intelligence), to people who have received enough support and counseling to be reasonably said to have made an informed, healthy choice for themselves. Not victims of other people's unethical behavior. I also don't support declarations of the opposite biological sex for the reason you cited. But I'm referring to people just trying to figure themselves out without doing harm to others.

It goes without saying, but I will say it here anyway, that I don't support people being exploited or harmed. In either direction.

[–]7874 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please point out exactly where I made any assumptions about you. Because it didn't happen. Yet you're already being quite rude.

I think I made it clear, but from your response, it seems like you didn't get my point, so I'll restate it and try to be more clear this time.

I am worried about the ridiculousness of "transtrenderism" lending credibility to "actual" transsexualism, which is a highly evil and destructive practice to homosexuals.