all 16 comments

[–]Hannibalboy93 36 insightful - 1 fun36 insightful - 0 fun37 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can't stand these gender psychos, they really are coming for us and what it means to be gay, never stop speaking out about this, the alphabet community is doing nothing but holding us back, they know once we have our own spaces our numbers will grow. They ban us on reddit to break us up to say, see, hardly anyone believes this.

[–][deleted] 28 insightful - 2 fun28 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

|"When it comes to two people loving each other or three people, whatever, it really doesnt matter."

ahem it matters to me. 3 people in a relationship will involve 3 people who aren't me.

The amount of people in the gender uwu crowed who are poly is amazing. Almost like it's narcissism.

[–]linda_senora 26 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Sexuality is redundant?

I wonder why she did not mention heterosexual people.

TRAs and trans people are worse than locusts.

[–]pacmanla 24 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 0 fun25 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I wonder why she did not mention heterosexual people.

A poster here gave a great analysis of why the trans crowd won't dare speak this nonsense to heterosexuals. I'm paraphrasing, but it essentially comes down to just basic bullying an already marginalized group belonging to a sexual orientation. They know that heterosexuals are the majority & don't care about being "right" about inclusion in their sex/dating lives.

Lesbians & gay men are "suppose" to be inclusive to marginalized groups (trans nonsense) & include them.

[–]Virginia_Plain 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, a lot of it smacks of "I thought you people were supposed to be open-minded."

Open-mindedness has sadly been perverted to mean "up for anything." I see it more as realizing that other people may have perspectives and needs that are different from your own and that you should not (within reason) bother others about it.

Gay and lesbian people are being bothered about it, and what I think is tragic is the self-criticism confessionals in which people prattle on about all the soul-searching they did to "overcome" whatever it was that made them uninterested in sleeping with a transwoman. If you are having to do that much work to make yourself interested, that should tell you something.

Someone else posted a video (either here or on one of the TERF blogs I follow, the inimitable Appropriately Inappropriate) of a lesbian woman saying something along the lines of "people are telling you to work on accepting everyone else, except yourself," and that connected with me. People are absolutely terrified of not being 100% accommodating to everyone, of not being an "ally," so terrified that they don't stop to ask themselves questions like "is this the kind of thing I would demand of someone else?"

Allyship should be a two-way street, but a lot of it is stated in terms of "you shut the hell up and do as I say." It's a synonym for "doormat." There is such a simpering codependency I see in many who do the ally thing. And the moment you say no, it does not matter what you've gone along with before, you are just as bad as the people who've done nothing at all.

[–]linda_senora 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That lesbian woman is wise.

Accepting yourself should come before accepting somebody else and quite frankly, trans people do not want acceptance. They want to dominate every person they meet. They want subservience.

Smart lesbians and gay men do well by voicing their objections to the trans lobby/ trans ideology.

[–]linda_senora 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course they will not go after straight men. Trans people will lose that fight.

I seriously despair when I see some gay men and some women claiming to be lesbians ignore the homophobic nature of transgenderism.

People like Ian McKellen will not give a rats arse because he is famous and old, nobody is going to pester him to date trans men. But why do younger gay men ignore the warning signs?

[–]spanishprofanity 20 insightful - 5 fun20 insightful - 4 fun21 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

can't go against the heteros 'cause then they'll get slapped by superstraight again

[–]linda_senora 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They will get slapped for real.

I think many straight men would turn violent towards a male impersonating a woman.

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I wonder why she did not mention heterosexual people.

Because they know they'll be told to fuck off.

These people are so dumb that they do not realize 'deconstructing' homosexuality will only impair the ability of gay men and lesbians to organize as a coherent social group.

Black activists established since day one that race is a trait that cannot be deconstructed. They know this shit doesn't work.

If these fucks were really serious about their goals they would concentrate their efforts into deconstructing heterossexuality, the hegemonic sexuality, and not homossexuality.

[–]linda_senora 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do think they realize the consequences of deconstructing homosexuality. That is precisely what they want.

They don't want lesbians and gay men to think for themselves and organize for their own benefit. TRAs and trans people want to become LGB's overlords.

[–]fuck_reddit 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Oh wow a homophobic clergy member telling me homosexuality doesn’t actually exist. SOOOO fucking progressive.

[–]Rage-Xion 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

"deacon" another one who skipped Deuteronomy 22:5.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Except that rule is bypassed if they identify as the gender of the clothing they're wearing.

[–]reluctant_commenter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sorry, what is the context for this video? I would love to learn more. This is so messed up.