you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no solution to this. By saying that a man who has sex with a transwoman is gay is factually correct, but goes against gender ideology that says he is straight. The statement also would call the transwoman a woman for the main part of the sentence but then a man when talking about his sleeping habits. That's like saying, "So when the innocent defendant commited the crime, he was without blame and fully culpable"

The problem isn't Stonewall using gender ideology here, it's that they used inconsistent logic.