you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Further to my other comment, do you see the problem with the converse of what you’re saying? That is the rhetoric that gay men should be attracted to biological females who wear strap-ons. If this were the case, many gay men and lesbians could frolick into the sunset together never having to worry about homophobia again unless they were to, you know, choose to indulge our fetishes for natural, biological sex parts.

[–]gummybear 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's amazing to me how these little assholes never have to practice what they preach. You will never meet a more homophobic man than an "AGP transbian". The disdain they have for gay males is intense and so is their sexual revulsion towards them. But they sit there like philosophers pontificating as to why lesbians simply cant accept his "girl dick". Notice how these heterosexuals simply change their "gender" but they never have to break their heterosexuality? But they expect us to break our homosexuality? So their sexuality is never even touched. They expect us to convert but there's no sexual conversion on their part.

A straight man with a wig wants to fuck a woman. He's still a straight man attracted to a woman. A straight woman with a vagina wants to fuck a man. She's still a straight women attracted to males. Their attraction is never questioned or interrogated. Theyre tasking people to do things they would never do to themselves.

Theyre still heterosexuals expecting homosexuals to accommodate them.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Notice how these heterosexuals simply change their "gender" but they never have to break their heterosexuality? But they expect us to break our homosexuality? So their sexuality is never even touched. They expect us to convert but there's no sexual conversion on their part.

Yes, THIS! And, to put it another way: these straight people feel entitled to sexually pursue others based on biological sex, while forbidding homosexuals to do the same-- no, YOU must be attracted to "gender identity". We need to call out this double standard, and start telling these gender-based-attraction-for-thee-but-not-for-me hypocrites: you first. After all, charity (and ostensible love of-- barf-- girldick/boipussy) begins at home.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

these straight people feel entitled to sexually pursue others based on biological sex, while forbidding homosexuals to do the same. . . . gender-based-attraction-for-thee-but-not-for-me.”

You are so good at distilling down the genderfuckery to their underlying “logic.” Allowing only trans people open sex-based attraction while everyone else gets held to the standards of gender-identity-based on Self-ID attraction. And it’s everyone else who’s obsessed with genitals and has a fetish, and also sex-based attraction by non-trans people is the only “fetish” or “kink” that is permissible to shame.