you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is not a bad use for the label pansexual. Attracted to everyone, no matter how trans their bodies are. Too bad pan is so accepting that it's not remotely gender validating.

Since Bi is transphobic anyways(though they can't ever make up their mind on that) there should be no need for a label like superbi, which means only attraction to non-trans.

Jesus it's tiring working in their semantic games..