you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The OP's (likely) point was that wearing dresses didn't start gender-identity crises en masse for those kids.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah, ok, that makes sense

[–]our_team_is_winning[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes! Thanks. It just shows that in an era where sex roles were much stricter, still nobody thought "oh he's wearing a dress, therefore he's a girl." Clothes don't make the sex.