I mean it is the truth though. Yes there are gays and more so lesbians who said no, but there are so many LGBs who said “what is the harm?” Part of the issue is that the purpose of gay rights orgs changed and stopped focusing on gay rights even before we got important things like employment discrimination protections in the U.S.. They acted like the fight was over and assumed that greater numbers of members and allies was a better thing for our rights, and that’s not crazy in and of itself. But yes, they failed to realize that people who are not same-sex attracted, even if purported allies, have their own agenda. People have kept on saying “what’s the harm?” as the harm becomes increasingly obvious and simultaneously as we have less and less space to talk about it. These organizations are no longer about same sex rights or run by people who are primarily motivated by obtaining that, but by power hungry ideologues who desire societal control, and maybe even a little bit of revenge. While many of LGB people who wanted basic gay rights have retired from activism to live quiet lives. But this power-hungry group that remained in activism (from Millennials and older) absolutely includes actual LGB people who may or may not realize they’re stooges. And definitely have a lot of cognitive dissonance or self interest that outweighs their interest in same sex rights (your Benjamin of Pink News types).

Yes, there was a genderjacking that was largely accomplished by outside money but this could not have been accomplished by LGB people who let that happen and threw the LGB people who said “no” under the bus. That’s why even Stonewall UK right now is run by a purported lesbian even though she has entirely converted the organization to focus on gender ideology which the previous leadership was not keen on. LGB like this are TRAs themselves and they give cover to this. I don’t know what it could be about other than power and societal control and a total reworking of the fundamentals of basic structural social institutions, something gay rights orgs never really sought to accomplish.

A huge part of this was conversion of LGBT and its infrastructure from a political interest alliance focused specifically on same sex rights to a purported social club for “gender, romantic, and sexual minorities” (GRSM). Now you get in by technical membership and un falsifiable “identity”. And as you know, I’m not here to denigrate bisexuals, but the ones who have zero interest in same sex relationships but still complain about visibility and being in “straight-passing relationships” are a large part of this problem, and legitimize it. Not the kind of bisexual participants we have in here but this kind of thinking based on bored, manufactured oppression, set the pattern for the takeover IMO. Not saying bisexual people have to be in a homosexual relationship to count, just that those who have no interest in them, do not take them seriously, and do not see how gay people are not similarly situated in this respect are the type of people who the former gay rights organizations have been encouraging to drown out the rest of us and dilute our interests.