I watched this video with Dave Rubin talking about Wokeness and Identity Politics. He points out he doesn't have an issue with gay men, "I'm married to one" (cymbal crash), but then he feels the need to stress he has nothing against Trans when he brings up "Rachel" Levine (not by name). He DOES point out how they endanger women's sports, but he stops there.
I feel like both he and the host felt a need to defend T because they stand up for LGB, as if they are remotely related. They're not.
The fact is that this fetish does not belong with LGB. We all know that here. T is something totally different. It's either self-loathing homophobia, which shows gay men (and women) need more support, or it's a disturbing sexual fetish found among straight men (AGP seems to be the majority of T, I think, correct me if I'm wrong, at least in the Western world). This fetish endangers women and we have an American Congress (and other Western govts) legally erasing the existence of women.
WHY do so many people feel the need to add that "I'm not racist or anything" disclaimer when it comes to T?
T is not natural. Being homosexual occurs naturally. LGB rights are a world away from T demands.
T endanger women. (T also create problems for men if we are talking about women trying to pass themselves off as men, but women pretending to be men are unlikely to beat, rape, or otherwise physically endanger men the way that T do to women.)
This was the video. No need to actually watch it unless you like Dave Rubin. Normally I do, but his and the host's defense of T bothered me a lot.
https://youtu.be/dzb8SbcoiEU
[–]reluctant_commenter 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]hetisachoice 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)