you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Taln_Reich 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

At this point we might as well scrap the concept of guides specific to a particular sexual orientation, and just make one guide with the four chapters "If you have a penis and your partner has a vagina", "If you have a penis and your partner has a penis", "If you have a vagina and your partner has a vagina" and "If you have a vagina and your partner has a vagina". Covers any conceivable case, in particular since any of these constellatiions is a possibility in every orientation (say, two transbians getting together)

[–]emptiedriver 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

why are there four? (what is the difference between the last two examples.. fauxginas?)

[–]Taln_Reich 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

argh, I made a mistake. It was supposed to be "If you have a penis and your partner has a vagina", "If you have a penis and your partner has a penis", "If you have a vagina and your partner has a penis" and "If you have a vagina and your partner has a vagina".

Why four? Well, two people that typically have either one set of genitals or the other (not going into atypical cases here, because that is a whole other rabbit hole) makes four possible combinations.

[–]emptiedriver 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You could just make the hetero couple one section, though. I mean, they're meant to be doing it together...

[–]Taln_Reich 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

so "If one of you has a penis and one of you has a vagina", "if both of you have a penis" and "if both of you have a vagina" ? Yeah, that admittedly seems more economical.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I think the problem is that there's no longer any acceptable junk-combo which DOESN'T include at least ONE penis. Penis is like (the Monty Python version of) Spam now: there's egg and penis; egg, bacon and penis; egg, bacon, sausage and penis; penis, bacon, sausage and penis; penis, egg, penis, penis, bacon and penis; penis, sausage, penis, penis, penis, bacon, penis tomato and penis; penis penis penis PENIS PENIS PENIS PEEEEENIS...

So sayeth The Woke :(