LGB Erasure"Book about lesbian sex - Girl Sex 101" - on cover 40% of "lesbians" are men, book have whole chapters about PiV and PiA sex

submitted by ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem from twitter.com

all 39 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 45 insightful - 2 fun45 insightful - 1 fun46 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm just staring at the screen. I have no idea what to type. It's like a feeling of anger and despair, and like when authority figures fuck with you but there is nowhere to go and nothing to say that can make things right because everyone is on the side of the authority figure, and there is no justice. Might makes right. We are getting completely fucked over and all the people who pretended to be allies and on our side and even voted for gay marriage are now applauding for the lesbian penis sex book.

I used to say a lot of the "support" we get from outsiders feels insincere and people used to get annoyed at me because support is support, and I hate to know that I was right. They never really supported us. They only supported an image of themselves as "being on the right side of history." We were just tools.

[–]julesburm1891 24 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The word Kafkaesque is over-used but it’s really the only word I can think of to describe what LGB people are experiencing now.

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I honestly felt like throwing up a bit. Adult males with penises and testicles have absolutely no fucking right, none whatsoever, to be presented as "girls" on a book entitled "Girl Sex 101" on a book about lesbian sex. This is grooming, homosexual conversion, and outright disgusting.

[–]reluctant_commenter 40 insightful - 1 fun40 insightful - 0 fun41 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Maybe I need to take a break... this is just depressing.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 29 insightful - 2 fun29 insightful - 1 fun30 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah... I feel like I'm going insane...like am I the close-minded one for thinking lesbians don't like dick?! Had a discussion w a gay friend about this last night and he said "some lesbians can like dick" as a gay man...it felt so disheartening, why is it so wrong to admit biological reality.

[–]julesburm1891 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Was your gay friend open to thinking that some gay guys like vagina?

[–]hufflepuff-poet 26 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yes! He said "well I've never dated a trans man but I would be open to it...", sooo wild hearing gay people call for their own conversion therapy.

[–]julesburm1891 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which begs the question of “if you could be open to fucking a female who identifies as a man, couldn’t you also be open to fucking a regular woman?” But, I suppose that’s where the mental gymnastics would begin.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's lip service more than anything. If he were in a situation where he could date a trans man, I doubt he would.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem[S] 32 insightful - 15 fun32 insightful - 14 fun33 insightful - 15 fun -  (5 children)

The main question is - why there is a dog?

[–]ColoredTwice 33 insightful - 13 fun33 insightful - 12 fun34 insightful - 13 fun -  (2 children)

So everyone will be asking why there is a dog and forget main complaints.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 26 insightful - 6 fun26 insightful - 5 fun27 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Genius

[–]hetisachoice 17 insightful - 13 fun17 insightful - 12 fun18 insightful - 13 fun -  (0 children)

How dare you assume its species. How very DARE you! For all you know, that dog could identify as a cat.

[–]Dravidian 11 insightful - 9 fun11 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

Lesbian dogs exist you bigot.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because of PiV and PiA doggy style, of course

[–]LasagnaRossa 33 insightful - 2 fun33 insightful - 1 fun34 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The males don't even attempt to look feminine! LOL!

Why the fuck are men drawn in a handbook for lesbians?!

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 32 insightful - 4 fun32 insightful - 3 fun33 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Gross. And I say this as someone who likes penises.

[–]fuckupaddamsBisexual Terve 22 insightful - 4 fun22 insightful - 3 fun23 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

This looks like the unsexiest book I've ever seen in my life just from those drawings alone

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

They all look like weird little goblins.

[–]strawberrysun 21 insightful - 4 fun21 insightful - 3 fun22 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

No one on that book cover looks anything like any lesbian I've ever had sex with.

I'm also very, very confused about the inclusion of a dog.

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 19 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Can't wait to get my guy on guy buttfuck how-tos from a "how to have heterosexual sex" guidebook.

Also why is there a fucking DOG on the cover among naked people?! Don't tell me this thing encourages bestiality too? Who the FUCK publishes this trash, like, who saw this and went "yep, this seems good to me, let's make it." Why did nobody tell this author no? We need to be more harsh on people's """creative""" ventures.

Edit: Also the inclusion of physical disabilities is so painfully forced it almost looks offensive, like a caricature. I doubt anyone feels "included" and "respected" by this, except maybe crossdressing perverts.

[–]DefinitelyNotJannatPussy connoisseur 15 insightful - 11 fun15 insightful - 10 fun16 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

Was eating dinner when i decided to click the link! Yuck, bad idea But hey at least we get dog lesbian representation....... Right?

[–]lil_lamb 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i wanna bleach my eyes. that book is a monstrosity lol

[–]PeakingPeachEaterfemale♀ | detrans🦎 | eater of peaches 🍑 16 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Should we be worried about the presence of a dog?

That had me LOL for that reply. Who knows if there'll be more dogs and other animals on books like these...yuck.

If you guys feel bad...here's some eye bleach : Patty Bouvier rejects lying T | The Simpsons.

Patty knows as a lesbian, that she's not attracted to penises. Makes me feel better knowing that shows back then were aware of these shady creeps trying to get at lesbian women.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Awesome clip Peach!

This is unrelated, but I've been meaning to ask, are you also PeachYoghurt? Just out of curiosity. Her videos are hilarious

[–]caitlLesbian 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God, why does it have to be this hard? I am a lesbian. I don't like dick. You think it would be simple.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is completely horrid. The only thing that helps is seeing all the comments in the Twitter thread calling it out, seeing exactly the things we are seeing! What vile, manipulative, disgusting, homophobic propaganda! This needs to be in a museum of propaganda someday. Jesus H Christ.

As a side note: why the fuck are there whole chapters on PiV and PiA if the fragile, gentle widdle twanswomen are supposedly too dysphoric to ever dream of using their cocks? It is so gentle and girly, and oh so harmless, you can pretend it's not there! Oh, but some of the cartoon trans-identified males have half-hard boners? Hmmm. Why could that be? They are always sooo dysphoric!

Side-side note: Why the fuck are transmen included in the cartoon "girls"? They and transwomen are always screeching about how transmen aren't lesbians, don't date lesbians, have nothing to do with lesbians. But, they always insist on including themselves! Not just here, but Aydian Dowling (transman) promoting HER, and the transman fujoshi being included in the main cast of L Word reboot. I could think of a hundred other examples. They insist on inviting themselves, but them turn around and scream at the lesbians for not kicking them out of lesbian spaces? What the actual fuck?

[–]Taln_Reich 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

At this point we might as well scrap the concept of guides specific to a particular sexual orientation, and just make one guide with the four chapters "If you have a penis and your partner has a vagina", "If you have a penis and your partner has a penis", "If you have a vagina and your partner has a vagina" and "If you have a vagina and your partner has a vagina". Covers any conceivable case, in particular since any of these constellatiions is a possibility in every orientation (say, two transbians getting together)

[–]emptiedriver 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

why are there four? (what is the difference between the last two examples.. fauxginas?)

[–]Taln_Reich 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

argh, I made a mistake. It was supposed to be "If you have a penis and your partner has a vagina", "If you have a penis and your partner has a penis", "If you have a vagina and your partner has a penis" and "If you have a vagina and your partner has a vagina".

Why four? Well, two people that typically have either one set of genitals or the other (not going into atypical cases here, because that is a whole other rabbit hole) makes four possible combinations.

[–]emptiedriver 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You could just make the hetero couple one section, though. I mean, they're meant to be doing it together...

[–]Taln_Reich 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

so "If one of you has a penis and one of you has a vagina", "if both of you have a penis" and "if both of you have a vagina" ? Yeah, that admittedly seems more economical.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I think the problem is that there's no longer any acceptable junk-combo which DOESN'T include at least ONE penis. Penis is like (the Monty Python version of) Spam now: there's egg and penis; egg, bacon and penis; egg, bacon, sausage and penis; penis, bacon, sausage and penis; penis, egg, penis, penis, bacon and penis; penis, sausage, penis, penis, penis, bacon, penis tomato and penis; penis penis penis PENIS PENIS PENIS PEEEEENIS...

So sayeth The Woke :(

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It gets even worse; assume that 40% at least of the people with vaginas/fake vaginas are post-op trans identifying men (including the one in the wheelchair whose genitals are unknown), and that means that over 65% of the people on the cover of "Girl Sex 101" are in fact men.

Fucking disturbing. This not a book for lesbians; it is a book for grooming lesbians into heterosexuality.

[–]RedditHatesLesbiansHomosexual Not Queer 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This makes me so sad. A book like this has potential to myth-bust things commonly seen in porn and teach how to have safe lesbian sex (since STDs are still a problem and protection is often disregarded since there isn't a risk of pregnancy.) Instead this is a joke... It's too much.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They appear to have realized how idiotic the cover is at some point and downplayed the "YOU SHOULD LOVE PENIS" bullshit by changing the cover of later editions (or maybe that's not the cover and the back or one of the inside pages? I dunno, at any rate it doesn't match the cover on current editions it seems).

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

...why is there a dog in the lineup?

[–]Taln_Reich 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

gah is this cover bad. Like, seriously, even though the lens of transgender. The person to the right of the one in the wheelchair and the leftmost person in the lowest row are essentially drawn as men, and the second person from the left in the lowest row is quite clearly meant to be a transgender man, which means that by including that person on a cover of a book regarding lesbianism they are misgendering this person by considering them women. So whether one views it though the lense of gender identity or biological sex it is offensive either way, so how did this ever pass muster?

And why, just why did they put that many transbians on the cover?

[–]sadbihours 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thankfully Diana Cage’s books haven’t been pulled. Here: https://www.amazon.com/Diana-Cage/e/B0034P8I2K/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1